LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2005, 10:26 PM   #1
t3gah
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arrow Gentoo 2005.0 AlphaServer Edition comparison to Red Hat 7.2 AlphaServer Edition or ?


Anyone try Gentoo 2005.0 on their AlphaServer yet? If so, what are the pro's and con's over say, Red Hat 7.2 or Debian 3.0r2?
 
Old 04-23-2005, 07:10 PM   #2
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
umm.. I don't have an AlphaServer.. but I would say for one.. Even Debian stable is more current than Red Hat 7.2...

Red Hat 7.2 would be a huge security risk unless you keep track of all bugs for all software on the system and update everything manually... Gentoo would offer better performance.. and much more current software...

Debian is rock solid and still maintained with security updates and stuff.. Gentoo is built for performance.. and can be very stable as well, but you need to know all of your CFLAGS and USE flags very well.. or else it can result in system instability and even speed issues..

If this is actually a server used for production services.. I would recommend FreeBSD honestly.. but I'm a little biased..

Debian Sarge would be more recommended.. as it's still very stable.. and used more current softwares... If you know what you're doing.. Gentoo is cool.. if not.. don't do it..

Hope I helped..
 
Old 04-26-2005, 04:47 PM   #3
t3gah
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by halo14
umm.. I don't have an AlphaServer.. but I would say for one.. Even Debian stable is more current than Red Hat 7.2...

Red Hat 7.2 would be a huge security risk unless you keep track of all bugs for all software on the system and update everything manually... Gentoo would offer better performance.. and much more current software...

Debian is rock solid and still maintained with security updates and stuff.. Gentoo is built for performance.. and can be very stable as well, but you need to know all of your CFLAGS and USE flags very well.. or else it can result in system instability and even speed issues..

If this is actually a server used for production services.. I would recommend FreeBSD honestly.. but I'm a little biased..

Debian Sarge would be more recommended.. as it's still very stable.. and used more current softwares... If you know what you're doing.. Gentoo is cool.. if not.. don't do it..

Hope I helped..
The AlphaServer's are test boxes that aren't on the internet. In fact none of the systems in my "lab" are exposed to the internet. The reason it was 7.2 was because some tests required that it be rh72. I put FreeBSD 5.3 on one of them a few days ago. Debian 3.0r2 is still on the other one. I have a bunch of prosignia's, presario's, prolinea's, contura's, proliant's, athlon rack servers and a poweredge 4300 running some tests with the freebsd alphaserver today.


FreeBSD is sweet but it too can have security issues because of openssl which i've been hearing about lately. I too am biased because I've been using FreeBSD since 3.3, which I still have. Thanks for the info though as many other people that don't know things about this and that can always get some insight from someone elses post.
 
Old 04-26-2005, 06:36 PM   #4
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
i never have security issues with FreeBSD.,... I get the security advisory mailing list and i script a portaudit daily.. That's why I love FreeBSD is because it has such fantastic system tools...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need of The Official Red Hat Linux Guides of enterprise 3 edition in pdf format 123abc Linux - Enterprise 4 06-13-2006 01:34 AM
buy red hat linux personal edition(box piece) deadlyquantizer Linux - Newbie 1 04-09-2004 03:31 PM
Red Hat Desktop edition discontinued - advice needed coolamit78 Linux - Software 1 12-01-2003 10:39 AM
Is Qt of Red Hat linux 9 is a free edition ??? nitin_kataria Programming 2 10-13-2003 09:33 AM
Red Hat Desktop Edition bkeating General 4 10-09-2002 07:41 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration