Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
02-27-2004, 09:37 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario
Distribution: Ubuntu, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 416
Rep:
|
Gentoo 1.4 dependency conflict in emerge system
Hi!
I'm building a Gentoo server, and am installing the Pentium 3 stage 2 tarball from Knoppix, using the Gentoo installation manual on their website.
I've followed all the steps without a hitch, chrooted, emerge sync, right up to the point where I'm doing: emerge system
I seem to have run into an odd circular dependancy. I can't post exact details since I don't have an SSH daemon running on the box and I'm currently at work, but here's the gist of it:
During the emerge system, it wants to upgrade python, from 2.x<current version>.r4 to 2.x.r20 or thereabouts - the revision was in the 20s. In order to do so, it needs to upgrade portage, so it tries to emerge a newer version of portage - however, the portage version has a dependency of python 2.x.r16, and I only have r4. So it then tries to emerge python... and can't because it needs portage.
So when I do emerge portage it tells me I need to emerge python, and when I do emerge python it tells me I need to emerge portage.
This strikes me as odd, because I'm using the official release and the official installation guide, and have followed the steps to the letter. Google has failed me.
Has anyone had this problem before? Any ideas?
--Rounan
|
|
|
02-27-2004, 01:15 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Did you do 'emerge rsync'?I had all kinds of issues with stage2 and stage3 installs a while ago and just went with stage1.
|
|
|
02-27-2004, 02:20 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario
Distribution: Ubuntu, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 416
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Did an 'emerge sync' as recommended by the install manual.
Don't know what the difference between sync and rsync is, but I'll try it when I get home.
The only difference ebtween a stage 1 and stage 2 system is the bootstrap, right? Using precompiled packages for gcc and basic system tools, rather than compiling? They've already specified better compile options for P3 than I would have used - taught me a couple, in fact - so I don't have a problem using their compilations.
How would compiling my own bootstrap resolve this kind of dependency?
--Rounan
|
|
|
02-27-2004, 09:06 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario
Distribution: Ubuntu, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 416
Original Poster
Rep:
|
emerge rsync did it. Still don't know what the difference is, but it's now compiling.
Thanks, crashmeister.
|
|
|
02-28-2004, 07:47 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Good - those gentoo installs are getting more difficult by the day for some reason the doc's never keep up with the actual install.My AMD64 is killing me.
|
|
|
02-28-2004, 11:17 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 569
Rep:
|
Just wondering ... why is this in the Debian forum?
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 04:08 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Dunno.We'll probably never get to the bottom of this.
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario
Distribution: Ubuntu, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 416
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ummm.... well... because there's no Gentoo forum.. and Gentoo's debian based... and because I didn't know you could post to the root "distro" forum and not a subsidiary....
and also.... oops.
--Rounan
|
|
|
02-29-2004, 05:42 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 569
Rep:
|
Gentoo isn't Debian based
|
|
|
03-05-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#10
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Moved accordingly
Cool
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|