Latest LQ Deal: Linux Power User Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.


  Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2005, 07:36 PM   #1
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware & Debian
Posts: 264

Rep: Reputation: 30
Cool (Free)BSD & Linux

I know that on many BSD-conferences or parties, they like to hang poor little TUX or make fun of Linux.

I was wondering: What's the difference between the two? I've had only a chance to work with linux so far, not anything BSD based (freeBSD).

Are both based on Unix, or is there a mayor difference, like between windows, mac, linux and others?

Old 11-23-2005, 08:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,161
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 136Reputation: 136
You'll find fundamental design differences between FreeBSD and Linux. FreeBSD is a different kernel altogether. The philosophy is also a lot different.

It's probably closer to a UNIX clone than Linux.

There is a quote somewhere:

"*BSD is what you get when UNIX hackers get together to port their OS to the PC."

"Linux is what you get when PC hackers get together to port UNIX to the PC."

I think that says a lot about the different approaches. With *BSD, you might have to re-learn some concepts from Linux though. Not difficult, just different.
Old 11-25-2005, 04:50 PM   #3
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,192

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
FreeBSD is a derivative of UNIX, from 3.6BSD if memory serves (you can read about FreeBSD's history if you wish), whereas Linux is UNIX-like.
Old 11-25-2005, 05:02 PM   #4
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
I thought this was a good read:

Im running FreeBSD 6.0 as a desktop. Only thing I found that it couldnt do is gaming (cedega) so Linux wins in that area. Other than that, to me everything works faster and more logical in BSD.
Old 11-25-2005, 05:21 PM   #5
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 75
I use both and find that performance wise there are more or less the same. My main gripe is that if you are used to the gnu tools, some options are not available if using the bsd tools. In terms of hardware support Linux is the clear winner. Also there are more proprietary apps available for Linux than the BSDs and for some apps, the BSDs have to use a Linux emulation layer. The ports system is my favourite feature on FreeBSD, its so easy to get the latest software, if you don't mind waiting for it to compile from source.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If Linux & BSD are free, why would a company pay for Unix? halfpower General 9 11-25-2005 11:35 AM
thinking of converting from linux to Free BSD berrance General 9 12-13-2004 08:28 AM
Three-boot system Win XP - Linux RH - Free BSD does not work tuanito *BSD 6 02-24-2003 04:16 AM
Choose Free BSD or Open BSD? Which one? explorer1979 *BSD 5 12-15-2002 12:26 PM
Bsd & linux thoughts! linear Linux - General 15 12-17-2001 10:39 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration