Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
03-11-2014, 07:24 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42
Rep:
|
Finding a suitable distribution for old Asus Eee 900
A friend gave me a good old Asus Eee 900 with 16 gb hdd (but with RAM upgraded from 1gb to 2gb) with a broken and cluttered Xandros install.
I'm looking for for a somewhat lightweight and minimalistic distribution which might work reasonable good on a Eee 900 2014. Or is this simply impossible? Is it just too old?
I've been using debian and debian-like distros for the most part but I'm very open to trying out other distinct branches.
The idea is to use it for surfing, writing, and hanging out on IRC. Nothing too fancy in other words.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated. Thanks!
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 07:29 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: May 2009
Location: Perth, AU
Distribution: LinuxMint
Posts: 390
Rep:
|
you didn't say what the CPU is ..
- the hdd would be nicer if it was about 40Gb,
but try anti-X
antix.mepis.org
mainly, because of the size of the hdd.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-11-2014, 07:35 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre2
you didn't say what the CPU is ..
- the hdd would be nicer if it was about 40Gb,
but try anti-X
antix.mepis.org
mainly, because of the size of the hdd.
|
Oh, sorry about that. It's a Celeron M ULV Processor 900MHz.
Thanks, I will check out anti-X
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 11:07 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
antiX should run well, I use Slackware on my EeePC 701. Actually anything should run well on that machine, if you don't use the heavy environments (KDE, Gnome, Unity) and rather go for something lightweight (XFCE, LXDE/LXQt, Enlightenment or some of the other WMs).
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 09:23 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,986
|
I run standard Debian with Xfce on my 900. Works fine, no noticeable lags, no problems. You may want to think about using an SD card or external USB drive for holding /home or even the rootfs, since the internal SSD isn't that big, or that fast. I've been running from a USB HDD, and while it's slower to boot, it runs fine once it finishes booting.
|
|
|
03-18-2014, 09:28 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Jessie
Posts: 814
|
I'm writing this on an Eee PC 901 with Lubuntu 13.04 installed. Mine has an Atom processor and 2 GB RAM. IDK how the Atom compares to the Celeron. I just have it installed on the internal drives, nothing in the card reader, and it runs fine (although a bit slow).
From power on to my homepage in Firefox is under a minute (estimated, I haven't actually timed it). FF tends to freeze every now and then (especially on opening a new tab), but give it 10 seconds and it will be back. LibreOffice works well, from what I've used of it. I haven't done much, just editing a doocument or two, but it runs fast enough for me.
The Lubuntu software center is slow, but useable. Just expect to wait a few seconds after almost every click.
I keep a CPU temperature icon in the menu bar along the bottom because I hear the fan spin up a lot. It doesn't seem to like flash at all, I've pushed it up to 65C just by atching videos on Youtube. Right now, I've been browsing this forum for about 20 minutes, and the temp is at 48C.
Random application launch times (after browsing this forum for 20 mins  ):
LibreOffice Writer: <7 seconds
Audacious: <3 seconds
Audacity: <5 seconds
Lubuuntu Software Center: <7 seconds
I hope this helps you make your decision. Good luck!
|
|
|
03-19-2014, 04:36 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle
Distribution: Debian Wheezy & Jessie; Ubuntu
Posts: 334
Rep:
|
Debian Wheezy worked "out of the box". I did upgrade the ssd to 64G. I have since replaced mine with a Vivobook x202e & installed Ubermix ( http://www.ubermix.org/) for my daughter to play with.
Regards,
Stefan
|
|
|
04-08-2014, 10:38 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 42
Rep:
|
Pretty much anything will work yuo would probably need about 3 gigs of swap, use the rest of the hdd for your root partition. and use an ssd card for a storage partition. Ive seen 32 gig cards on sale for unde 25$. If you DL alot of movies or big files Maybe Go with a 64 or 128. You really don't need a socalled lightweight distro for that machine. If you like Slackware for example try Vector or Zenwalk Not trully lightweight but the install is smaller than a Slackware install. It will give you a little more room to DL large files and simply move them to your storage partition.
|
|
|
04-15-2014, 08:45 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 472
Rep: 
|
Might want to sdteer clear of some of the more bloated distros, like Ubuntu- but some of the lighter distros, like Crunchbang [it's like a minimalist Debian, with the Openbox window-manager instead of a desktop environment) or the already-mentioned AntiX (also Debian based, with a choice of several different window-managers instead of a resource-hogging DE) will FLY on the machine.
|
|
|
04-16-2014, 03:34 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hey all! Thank you so much for all your wonderful tips. I played around a little and found that many distros proved to work out really well, to my surprise. Anyway, it ended up staying with Bodhi Linux. It works really well, looks good and I kind of like it for the lulz also.
Thanks again. Now I'm going to try to get antiX to work on my acer aspire 1413lc (it doesn't even have wifi  )
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|