Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've used a few distro's and have settled on Arch Linux for now...
However this is my delima..
I am seeking a distro that has the following characteristics..
-- Source based Package manager
-- Create own packages easily for offline repository (backend machines)
-- Init.d scripts are located in /etc/init.d
-- rc run levels in seperate dirs. (/etc/rc0.d, rc3.d, etc..)
-- configuration of network interfaces in seperate files (like RH)
-- Not dependant on gui. (CLI install with kickstartish options)
Arch has satified alot of my requirements however, I dislike the
"rc.conf" where everthing is located (startup scripts/network/hostname).
I've run Solaris 9 @ work for a yr or so and like a few things about it..
However I know there isn't a silver bullet...
FC1-4 was my fav for a few years until it seemed bloated in FC3 and FC4,
then I switched to arch...
Since you're familiar with linux why don't you give yourself more challenge than newbie's distro such as FC. Take Suse or Slackware. Once taken you'll never live these babies!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.