Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If so, could you go through the steps that you used in compiling it. Maybe I'm just an idiot, but I have followed the directions of several web pages and have yet to end up with a working kernel. I don't get any errors during compilation, I just get a kernel panic when I try to boot the new kernel. I may be screwing something up in the config when it comes to the file system settings. I see when it tries to boot that it can't mount the file system.
the information in the kernel howto should contain all you need (and the fact that it's 2.4.20 won't affect a thing) you're presumably just not choosing correct values. the best way to learn is often to use an existing configuration from your distribution (often stored in /boot/config-2.4.20 or similar) and then personalise it only a little.
Here's what my screen looks like when the system freezes up :
***************************************************************
RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
Freeing initrd memory: 246K freed
VFS: Mounted root(ext2 filesystem).
Loading module reiserfs . . .
insmod: reiserfs: no module by that name found
Loading module ide-scsi . . .
insmod: ide-scsi: no module by that name found
kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 16:02
Ok, thanks. I did initially compile reiser into the kernel, and I got that kernel to boot. But then I got an error during boot that said something about too many mounted file systems (or something like that, I can't be sure). So I thought to try reiser as a module as the default config had it that way. But it seems obvious as to why that won't work. The kernel can't load modules if it can't load itself (or that's what my thoughts are and they could very well be wrong).
What are the neccesities as far as File System config if I am using reiser and fat 32 partitions ?
I like to compile filesystem types support into the kernel rather than as modules.
In your /etc/fstab file, you should use the notail option for your boot partition if you chose to create a ReiserFS filesystem on it. If you only created / as ReiserFS, your /boot is part of /.
I make a separate ext3 filesystem /boot partition as it is considered more mature than ReiserFS.
Last edited by fancypiper; 03-17-2003 at 03:38 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.