Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-14-2014, 09:11 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Distribution: Ubuntu 14.04
Posts: 35
Rep:
|
Debian vs. Arch: Which is faster with a low-spec laptop?
Hello.
I have decided that I want to switch distros, because elementary is getting unsatisfying. This is my first distro,btw. I"m considering switching to Arch, but I don't know if it's faster than Debian. I need advice.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 09:23 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753
|
Given a similar setup (same DE, etc.) arch can be faster If you do a lot of stuffing around. But not by much. IMO anyway.
Debian is a lot easier to use for a ubuntu refugee than arch.
You might do better to use slackware than arch, IMO rolling release distros (like arch) are a little to prone to breakage.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 09:34 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,387
Rep: 
|
as far as i know you can compile packages on arch so that would speed up your computer a little. However there are ready made arch distros like Archbang.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 11:38 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,243
|
It would help if we knew what was "unsatifying". But since you say your computer is low-powered, I assume that it's struggling a bit with Gnome?
If you're used to Elementary, then it would make more sense to stay in the Debian family. You could try Mint. which seems the best of the bunch to me. Try the Mate version, and if that doesn't improve things, then the Xfce one.
Arch does things very differently: there's the right way, the wrong way, and the Arch way! But the documentation is very good. The genuine article is tricky to set up, as there's no installer: just a set of commands you enter in a console. Bridge Linux is an installation disk that sets up Arch for you with Xfce.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 12:19 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Given the exact same configuration (same DE, same daemons running in the background, ...) there should not be a significant difference between those two (or any other) distros. Arch should be slightly faster, but that should be unnoticeable. You will get the best speed improvement by choosing a different, more lightweight, desktop environment, like MATE, XFCE or LXDE instead of concentrating which distro to use.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 12:40 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,294
|
Quote:
like MATE, XFCE or LXDE instead of concentrating which distro to use.
|
In elementaryOS you can do
Code:
apt-cache policy xfce
same for LXDE, MATE. I would throw in Fluxbox and Icewm also but it might be more than you can handle.
Judging by your query.
How I can make Icewm look for me http://antix.freeforums.org/download/file.php?id=556
Last edited by rokytnji; 01-14-2014 at 12:45 PM.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 07:35 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2013
Distribution: Ubuntu 14.04
Posts: 35
Original Poster
Rep:
|
So, if I got Cinnamon (which is what I use now) on Arch, would it be faster? And is Debian any faster than elementary?
Last edited by eufawif; 01-14-2014 at 07:42 PM.
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 07:53 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eufawif
So, if I got Cinnamon (which is what I use now) on Arch, would it be faster? And is Debian any faster than elementary?
|
Given the same configuration, in both cases: No, not noticeable.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|