Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well, i'll get right to it. I've been using Linux for some time now, but one thing i've had a hard time doing, is finding a distro for my desktop usage.
I've tried a lot of different distros and I run Red Hat on our company servers.
To be honest, I dont like Red Hat for a personal desktop, so that is out. I get tired of Red Hat not updating packages on a regular basis so I have to do it on my own.
But this is what im looking for:
I want something that, if I do decide to use a package system (apt, pkg, ports) keeps their packages up to date regularly.
I've come to the point where I prefer to download and install software from source. its the only way to make sure my software is up to date.
So, with that in mind, these are the following im looking at:
I think he means Red Hat aren't all that quick to pass on new versions of software.
If you're looking for a Linux distro that's releases new software versions quickly, compiles them from source and keeps them up to date with a Ports system then Gentoo is probably your best bet. New software releases make it into Portage (the name of Gentoo's Ports system) within hours of their release and are compiled from source to a set of compile and configure flags that are user specified. This link includes a little more information.
The other alternative, if you just want to build the packages and keep them up to date yourself is Linux from Scratch which as it's name implies, is built entirely from scratch with no overriding packaging system, nothing. It's best summed up but it's motton: Your distro, your rules.
When you say RedHat does not update packages do you mean for bugs or security issues?
The up2date is very good tool to use. As LSD mentioned, it gets hold when I cant update software to the latest version. For example, on RH 7.3, the latest package release is like 3.4.1 or something, when 3.7.2 is out...
I like the idea of having packages updated regularly. Whether I use a package system or compile from source.
Lately, i've become so frustrated with software being out of date for RH 7.3 and 8.0 (dont trust 9.0 at all on production servers), that I just started grabbing software from source and compiling it.
Looks like i'm going to be looking at Gentoo and FreeBSD or OpenBSD...
Good stuff though. I like finding out all the ins and outs of distros.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.