Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
12-01-2011, 10:33 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Rep: 
|
Choosing the right distro, Locked down from within.
I'm looking to put a box at a client site which will be connected to the client's home router for internet.
That box will have remote access software on it and will have untrustworthy contractors logging in and using the browser. So, I'm looking for a distro that would be LOCKED DOWN to the max from the user side.
Regardless of the distro I'm planning on blocking all possible applications, (especially the terminal) leaving only the browser accessible. Blocking all the ports and all the domains aside from the 2 that the user/contractor should access. The user will have non-admin privileges of course.
So, taking all that into consideration, is there a distro that somehow facilitates being locked down from within, to minimize the possible attack surface?
That's a home network we're talking about, so I'm considering security VERY seriously.
Can the security even be guaranteed to a certain extent with this setup, should I even go ahead with this project?
Any and all other possible security tweaks are definitely welcome, I'm a newbie so everything and all is new to me.
Guys, your thoughts are greatly appreciated!
Thank you beforehand!
Last edited by ArTranc3; 12-01-2011 at 10:35 PM.
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 10:56 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Fedora & CentOS
Posts: 854
Rep: 
|
All distro's should be capable of doing what you want..
Keep in mind though, with physical access to the computer, things become a lot harder to protect.
Some things to think about
-> booting to a live cd will give full access to the HDD -> disable alternate boot devices in the BIOS and password the BIOS -> single user mode -> password protect the boot menu -> Removal of the disk and putting it into a external caddy/spare computer -> disk encryption -> if the machine stays on, the encryption key can possibly be recovered from RAM with a "cold boot attack", although, this is somewhat unlikely..
It all depends on your definition of "LOCKED DOWN to the max", and "VERY seriously".
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 11:02 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I'm not as worried about the actual client being able to get in.
My main concern are the contractors. Those contractors will not have any access to the box except for that which is given by the TeamViewer.
The box will not have a CD/DVD-ROM.
The main concern should be the contractors hacking their way out of the locked down box and messing up the client's system thats on the same local network. Thats my main concern.
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 11:18 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Fedora & CentOS
Posts: 854
Rep: 
|
Apologies, I misread your OP in that i thought the untrusted folk had physical access..
As i said, pretty much any distro is going to do what you want.
You can create firewall (iptables) rules to only allow certain ports to certain IP's.
Proxy (squid) rules to only allow certain websites.
User groups, permissions, ACL's etc, to restrict particular programs.
So, I would pick the distro you are most comfortable with.
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 11:29 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Rep: 
|
Have you considered an OS like OpenBSD? It's not Linux, but it is a "secure by default" kind of Operating System with maximum security features built right into the OS that would require a lot of tweaking/work in other *nix systems.
Last edited by vharishankar; 12-01-2011 at 11:30 PM.
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 11:44 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Thank you fukawi1!
vharishankar, I already settled with CentOS.
Any specific guides or suggestions on how to bring forth the security configurations I mentioned. I only tentatively know how it should work in theory but will need massive research to bring it into fruition.
If guys have any specific guides that would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
12-01-2011, 11:46 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Rep: 
|
OK, since you've settled down to a distro, you could mark this thread "solved".
Last edited by vharishankar; 12-01-2011 at 11:47 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|