Can we consider LTS a real distro?
 

As far I know a distro is consider a operating system with a own package manager. However LFS hasn't a package manager because you install package manually from source. So, can we consider LFS a distro?
Thanks.

There is no definitive definition of a "distro", but Wikipedia has the following (my emphasis):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution

I would tend to agree with that. A bare-bones distro may depend on the user to manually install any required software from source, or perhaps leave it to the user to install a package manager if they so desire.

I think they say they aren't a distro. It is just a cookbook not any sort of build.

However, we see it on places like distrowatch.

I doubt anyone would complain one way or the other.

I agree with jefro.

LFS is not a distro; it's a book.

Discussing whether it is a distro is not worth the electrons it takes to do so.

It's a meta-distribution.

So it's a distribution about distributions?:)

It's about Linux. Linux as such, not a distro. But once you've created it, you can make it look and behave like any distro you like.

For me, LFS is two things. It's a series of instructions for creating a Linux distro, and it is the finished distro itself. What the minimum stage is in that process that your newly-created distro can actually be called a distro is open to debate. ;-)