Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
09-07-2005, 10:17 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Milwaukee WI
Distribution: none, yet
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Best distro for a newbie
I've been interested in moving to Linux for quite some time but have had problems along the way. I'm looking for a decently easy distro to use because of my newbie status, and one that will work on my current hardware:
Asus A8V Deluxe (socket 939)
AMD 64-bit 3500+
Two 160 gig SATA HD's in RAID 1
ATI X800 256mb AGP8x graphics card
Also prefer if it will support WoW and CS either though Cedega or Wine.
Thanks in advance for any help.
|
|
|
09-07-2005, 10:30 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,272
Rep:
|
Search these forums for similar threads, there are hundreds. There are also a few threads with links to questionnaires that will point you to your 'perfect distro'.
All distros pretty much support the same hardware, same kernel you see. So examine a few hardware lists, HCL here for example for hardware that is known to be supported by Linux
|
|
|
09-07-2005, 03:02 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Milwaukee WI
Distribution: none, yet
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Actually my main concerns were the SATA hard drives and raid controller. In the admittedly little research I did I found that my initial first pick (linspire) does not support SATA.
I've been looking at Ubuntu/Kubuntu
is there much of a difference between GNOME and KDE or would somone who has never really used linux (such as myself) not really notice a difference?
Last edited by Horkdoom; 09-07-2005 at 03:29 PM.
|
|
|
09-07-2005, 03:51 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Distribution: SuSE, Fedora, Mandrake/Mandriva, Linspire
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
I agree with phild.g. on searching on the different threads.
As far as what works well for a beginner, it depends on what kind of beginner you are.
If you are familiar with how Windows functions and are trying to break from the "Empire of Bill", Linspire is an easy transition. SuSE, Fedora, Mepis and pretty much any of the bigger distros are fairly easy to use and are going to depend on what you are trying to accomplish.
I spent about 2 months playing with different distros till I finally settled on SuSE. I also have Linspire installed on my son's computer to ease his transition to Linux. My only concern with Linspire is that because of the way it is set up, you may not learn how to manipulate your system via command line or other methods. For that reason I prefer my SuSE or even Fedora just because it begs the question of learning to use your system somewhat. They are still user friendly, but don't lure you into a false sense of laziness.
Enjoy
|
|
|
09-15-2005, 12:58 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Southern CA
Distribution: SuSe 10 RC1
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Horkdoom
is there much of a difference between GNOME and KDE or would somone who has never really used linux (such as myself) not really notice a difference?
|
There is a difference and it just comes down to preference. Alot of diehards prefer Gnome but there just as many who prefer KDE.
As far as the SATA HD's ... the distros with the newer kernels tend to support them more than the older kernels do. I believe that Debian Sarge (their latest one) supports SATA.
|
|
|
09-15-2005, 01:32 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
My system for deciding which flavour of Linux suits me is simple...
Does it play my CDs without messing around with stuff.
Linspire does.
No-one else does.
|
|
|
09-15-2005, 11:31 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: New Lenox, IL
Distribution: Fedora Core 4; Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Preview); CentOS 4
Posts: 81
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Horkdoom
I've been looking at Ubuntu/Kubuntu
is there much of a difference between GNOME and KDE or would somone who has never really used linux (such as myself) not really notice a difference?
|
Ubuntu would be an excellent choice, especially with version 5.10 ("Breezy Badger") due out on October 13th.
As for Ubuntu/KDE, they're both good desktops, but I strongly prefer Gnome. As far as the ease of transition for a Windows user, I'd say they're probably about the same. I haven't used Kubuntu myself, however, from what I've heard, KDE isn't as well integrated as Gnome is in Ubuntu. Give Gnome a try. You'll like it!
Have fun!
|
|
|
09-16-2005, 02:33 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: England, South East
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 358
Rep:
|
i'd say suse considering how great some of its tools are like YaST, YOU and SaX2 nothing is easier .
|
|
|
09-16-2005, 03:14 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
I'd love to use Suse. In most respects it's a great distro. However, it's the CD playing thing.
Why can't most Linux distros get CD's to play without mucking about, and then not particularly well when you do get some sort of sound.
By the way, took someone's (cheers, mate!) advice on how to get a free version of "Linspire 5.0". Gone off it a tad. Although it plays CD's beautifully "straight from the box", it won't allow me to set up for UK keyboard. Having to hit the key for " to get @ is a real pain.
I'm going to persevere with Suse.
Also, how the hell do you change the defaults for Lilo in Linspire!
Oh, and if anyone can tell me how to get CD's playing well in Suse, I'd love them forever (but at a distance). I think my sound card is a VIA AC '97.
Last edited by bargeemike; 09-16-2005 at 03:25 AM.
|
|
|
09-16-2005, 10:17 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu with IceWM
Posts: 1,775
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bargeemike
Why can't most Linux distros get CD's to play without mucking about, and then not particularly well when you do get some sort of sound.
|
Are you talking about regular audio CDs? Because when I pop one into Ubuntu (even Ubuntu live), it immediately appears on my desktop and just starts playing.
If you're talking about an MP3 CD, it's because MP3s are a proprietary format that most Linux distros don't come with support for out of the box for ideological or cost reasons.
|
|
|
09-16-2005, 11:12 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 206
Rep:
|
try a bunch - they're all free! then pick one that suits your needs and go with it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|