Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm thinking of going out and buying a new distro but what would be a good one for personel use and would also work as a server really good. Any suggestions?
This is a personal preference. Always will be, but if I had to run a secure server of whatever type and also use it for home and/or personal dinkering around, it would have to be Red Hat 7.2 < just because it's the newest. No sense getting an older version. Mandrake is very user friendly and can run a server well enough, but I believe Red Hat will give you the most for your money.
i would have to agree with taz.devil, as redhat is proven and one of the most popular distros used for servers, but it is also a great distro for just home/personal desktop type use...
second choice would have to be with either slackware or debian.... very robust distros....
Anybody who recommends Redhat 7.2, obviously hasnt used SuSE 7.3. SuSE 7.3 is amazing. its easier to setup up than redhat, and it feels a lot more professional and stable.
You will find that redhat will rebadge a lot of RPM packages and just stick them in a new distro to save them recompiling. this can have a negative effect of stability.
If the network card is supported by the kernel or if there is a driver for it does it really matter what distro you have?
I can't see it working in one distro and not the other.
RedHat 7.2 is a good distro. I have 5 servers running and one laptop, the laptop and my home server are running 7.2. The rest of them so far are running 7.1.
I am still downloading the Docs for 7.2 in iso form from redhat.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.