Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
05-11-2012, 05:48 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Distribution: ubuntu/debian
Posts: 152
Rep:
|
Actual benefit of Backtrack over Ubuntu for security purposes.
Hello,
I am using Ubuntu for nearly everything and I'm working more and more with security software and I was wondering why most of my colleagues use Backtrack instead. I know because most of them use windows its easier to have a preconfigured system to work with but so far I've been able to do everything with ubuntu.
In short: Can I get some valid arguments to switch to Backtrack for these purposes?
thanks, Steven
|
|
|
05-11-2012, 05:57 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Fedora & CentOS
Posts: 854
Rep: 
|
Backtrack is set up for doing that kind of work. All the relevant packages are installed, and irrelevant packages aren't.
The boot menu is set up with many boot options, for forensics, networking, mounting, etc.
It is really a convenience thing, having most of the packages you need for that type of work, all there, installed configured etc. Rather than having to go looking for them, often those types of tools wont be included in Ubuntu's package lists, and would have to be compiled from source.
There may be some minor issues getting some tools to work with some alternate distro's, but the majority of the tools included with backtrack should work fine with any other Linux distro.
|
|
|
05-11-2012, 10:08 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Distribution: ubuntu/debian
Posts: 152
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fukawi1
It is really a convenience thing, having most of the packages you need for that type of work, all there, installed configured etc. Rather than having to go looking for them, often those types of tools wont be included in Ubuntu's package lists, and would have to be compiled from source.
|
Okay, thank you. It seems that I'll be using ubuntu by default and switch over to backtrack if I miss something.
|
|
|
05-11-2012, 10:04 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast, USA
Distribution: Fedora 18, Slackware64 13.37, Windows 7/8
Posts: 386
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steviepower
Okay, thank you. It seems that I'll be using ubuntu by default and switch over to backtrack if I miss something.
|
Why switch to BackTrack at all? You can easily install the packages used by backtrack in Ubuntu and you get the added benefit of being able to leave out the redundant programs and selectively pick and choose what gets installed.
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 01:58 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Distribution: ubuntu/debian
Posts: 152
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thund3rstruck
Why switch to BackTrack at all? You can easily install the packages used by backtrack in Ubuntu and you get the added benefit of being able to leave out the redundant programs and selectively pick and choose what gets installed.
|
that was actually the point of me asking that question here  But not everything is easilly installed on ubuntu, I'll use ubuntu until I run into problems with software on there.
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 12:23 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070
|
One of the advantages, if you can use a Live CD (/DVD), is that in spite of working in 'dubious' circumstances, you are unlikely to get your OS 'hacked'. This is less of an advantage if you feel that you can't just (easily) get everything that you want on one handy live CD, or, for some reason, a live CD isn't suitable.
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 12:30 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
Security software from a group of security professionals (let's say hackers) leaves you with a two edged sword. On one hand the distro may be totally secure. On the other hand it may contain code that could render your system less secure.
There is no secure OS for the most part. BSD's have claimed some titles for a while but the issue is that thousands of apps installed create holes.
Consider a hardened OS. Learn and use as many best practices as you can to avoid issues. Keep it up to date.
Live cd's are a pretty good choice for limited access.
|
|
|
05-15-2012, 07:05 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: May 2010
Location: Eindhoven
Distribution: ubuntu/debian
Posts: 152
Original Poster
Rep:
|
@Jefro ok... but I'm someone who wants to do these hacks and scans and tests using the software I can install on ubuntu and is already installed on backtrack like wireshark, aircrack-ng, ettercap and more like that I've always been able to do this on ubuntu and it's easier to do because I also document and have my old documentation on there usually.
I wanted to know if it would be a good idea to start using backtrack from now on. But I don't see any reason to do that cause I'm happy with Ubuntu atm and there is nothing I can't do on there.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|