LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2005, 10:07 PM   #16
dyw
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15

I have a Pentium1, 40MB RAM, 800MB HD, no CD. It runs Debian fine. I installed the Debian Stable 3.0 via floppies and the net, then got some packages from the testing branch. I run IceWM as the window manager, rox-filer and xfe for file managing, dillo for browsing (firefox works but starts slow), abiword for word processing, and at one point I considered making it a web server so I installed dhttpd, and I can't remember what else.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 11:43 AM   #17
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: Re: A distribution for a slowwww computer

Quote:
Originally posted by cavalier
I have no idea about it's ability to be loaded without a bootable CD, but Damn Small Linux (DSL) is what my friend is using on a whole host of P166 machines with either 64 or 96 megs of RAM and 3 GB hard drives.
It actually can boot from a CD, it just wasn't cooperating at first. I downloaded DSL, and it runs fine and everything, but it lacks some things. I've already ran into an issue with running make. It doesn't have it. Other than a few minor setback, it works fine.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 12:20 PM   #18
youngtom
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Rio de Janerio
Distribution: suse 9.1, suse 9.2, redhat enterprise, ubuntu, kubuntu
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by RodimusProblem
Anything with Fluxbox or XFCE or another lightweight windowmanager should be an option (even Mandrake).

One of the computers I manage has only 64 MB of RAM and can run Feather pretty well.
I think that PodimusProblem has got it exactly right. As long as you run a lightweight windowmanager almost any Linux distribution should work. Here's a good link that if you are interested in finding out more about X window managers - http://www.xwinman.org/

Last edited by youngtom; 03-04-2005 at 12:25 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie needs help choosing the best distribution for an old computer g-string 3 Linux - Distributions 29 07-31-2006 03:19 PM
Quake 3 Demo Slowwww JUDOLIZARD Linux - Games 3 11-14-2005 04:46 AM
Linux distribution on a slow computer? blackman890 Linux - Distributions 28 06-03-2005 03:10 PM
distribution for old, slow computer p1800 Linux - Newbie 20 04-19-2005 09:42 PM
multimedia distribution to make a hi-fi out of my computer LordFrancis Linux - Distributions 2 11-01-2004 05:52 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration