LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-19-2011, 07:57 AM   #1
prafulla173
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Which edition should i download


Hello
i am new to linux world.i want to use redhat linux os which edition shold i instal in dual boot eniviroment in my pc . i am already use RHEL 5 i386,still i want to know which is better for my personal use is fedora 15 or RHEL 6 or RH 9.
 
Old 10-19-2011, 08:14 AM   #2
teebones
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: /home/teebones
Distribution: sometimes this, sometimes that..
Posts: 502

Rep: Reputation: 56
Not sure, what you are saying but:

Redhat only has trial versions available for free. These expire, if you need a redhat version (no trial), you have to pay.
Fortunately, there is a community driven free release of the redhat (based on redhat's sourcecode packages), which is practicly a clone, called CentOS.
The same packages, same updates, same stability etc etc.. only called differently, and no support by mail or phone, just forum.

www.centos.org

But ok, you ask what to use RHEL5, Fedora 15 or RHEL6 or RH9?
Apple vs oranges situation here.
Fedora 15 is a testbed for Redhat releases, thus not stable by design compared to EL.
EL5 vs EL6, use the latest ofcourse (longer support in updates, newer stable software, improvements in redhat tools, etcetc)


But you cannot compare Fedora with EL releases, since their usage is different (also development method), and targeted audience.

EL for top stability, Fedora for expermenting new techniques.
Fedora release cycle is compared to EL, very fast. Suppport for updates etc, are compared to EL, short.

Oh, and DO NOT USE RH9, i repeat DO NOT.... unless you want to be very insecure, use very old programs etc etc..

Last edited by teebones; 10-19-2011 at 08:16 AM.
 
Old 10-19-2011, 02:53 PM   #3
wpeckham
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, Vsido, tinycore, Q4OS
Posts: 2,731

Rep: Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130Reputation: 1130
who paid what?

If you have a paid license, GOOD FOR YOU! Install RHEL6: it is supported and what you paid for.
If not, then you need to decide based upon your purpose and goals.

------------- The rest of this is non-RHEL.
CentOS is as stable as RHEL, and updates and patches run a bit behind (but not far behind). They are binary compatible, so most RHEL packages work just fine. New versions are released from one to six months behind RHEL, and have much the same lifespan.

Fedora is less stable, changes MUCH faster (New version targets the 6 month mark. You need to reinstall at least every 18 months, and most people re-install whenever the new version is released). ON the other hand, it has the best and newest TOYS! Wanna play?

If you are playing with it, the newest Fedora you can grab. If you WORK with it: get the latest CentOS.

Never run anything obsolete unless you have an application or compatibility issue that requires the older version.

[ This from the guy that ran C/PM on Vectra and MPM-II on ALTOS in the back room until 2006! ]
[ And don't you DARE get my wife started on my teaching the kids to play old DOS games on DOSBOX and FREEDOS!! ]
;-)
 
Old 10-20-2011, 06:27 PM   #4
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Linux Mint
Posts: 1,677

Rep: Reputation: 387Reputation: 387Reputation: 387Reputation: 387
[QUOTE=wpeckham;4502761]This from the guy that ran C/PM on Vectra and MPM-II on ALTOS in the back room until 2006! /QUOTE]
I ran CP/M on my Basis 108 (an Apple ][ close with an onboard Z-80 card) but gave it up back in the mid 1980s.

Fedora supports each release for about 13 months; I run it as my primary OS, but I definitely would not do so in a situation where system stability is important.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:22 PM   #5
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 14,171
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833
Since you asked specifically which is "better for my personal use," I would say Fedora.

It's designed for personal use, rather than for use in the enterprise.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I download the ubuntu ultimate edition 1.7 ? barnsley Linux - Newbie 1 11-09-2008 07:50 AM
Download a Free Developer's Edition penright Linux - Enterprise 2 04-21-2007 10:05 AM
Lycoris Download Edition nTanker Linux - Distributions 4 01-09-2005 07:25 PM
Mandrake 9.2 Rc Download Edition DavidTempler Mandriva 4 10-23-2003 11:39 AM
Mandrake 9.2 differences between Download Edition and PowerPack edition piratu Mandriva 7 10-21-2003 09:10 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration