LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2011, 11:27 AM   #31
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301

For disk I/O see:
http://serverfault.com/questions/126...sh-dirty-pages
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 12-30-2011, 08:30 AM   #32
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
One more thing to try is try a different filesystem and I/O scheduler.

http://blog.nexcess.net/2010/11/07/c...-io-scheduler/

I recommend JFS and deadline I/O scheduler, but you can try other combinations and see if it helps.
 
Old 01-09-2012, 02:07 PM   #33
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
I have been testing new performance settings in the 3.2 kernel, and I strongly recommend using this kernel PLUS turn on zcache (not zram, but can be used with zram if you want). I've found zram to mostly be useless, but zcache does what it says it does and works well so far. The 3.2 kernel has lots of performance improvements that may solve this issue. It solved all my performance issues. I also enabled huge pages, but this may not be needed.

I have also found some of these settings to also improve performance:
http://kb.lsi.com/KnowledgebaseArticle11050.aspx
 
Old 01-09-2012, 02:23 PM   #34
FredJones
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Distribution: ArchLinux 64 bit (with Openbox and fbpanel)
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 23
Hmm, that's very interesting. I am still planning on installing from scratch with 64 bit, but I think ArchLinux is only on 3.1.7 kernel. But anyhow it's a rolling release so as soon as 3.2 is ready. I just haven't yet had time to rebuild my machine--work keeps getting in the way.

Thank you.
 
Old 02-22-2012, 08:43 AM   #35
FredJones
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Distribution: ArchLinux 64 bit (with Openbox and fbpanel)
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 23
I am responding to an old thread that I started, but I want to finish the story.

I bought a new disk and installed it and then installed Arch 64 bit there. While using my 32 bit install later, I mounted the new disk and opened it in Thunar and heard the crazy scraping noise. No question that this is a software issue NOT a hardware issue.

The new install works beautifully! I am using Openbox now which I may end up liking even better than Xfce. I unzipped a 20 MB archive and no sound. I ran now an import of a 330 MB SQL dump. It also ran fine and the disk was completely silent. As a matter of fact, thus far everything is quiet. Finally.

I now see:

Code:
$ free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:          3821       3193        627          0         76       1894
-/+ buffers/cache:       1223       2597
Swap:            0          0          0
I.E. I now have my full 4G (total before was 3271).

Seems whatever it was, it is now fixed.

Thank you to everyone who helped.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swap file vs. swap partition verndog Ubuntu 16 07-09-2012 08:49 PM
swap file or swap partition? What is better? zemir Linux - Newbie 28 08-19-2011 09:15 PM
Can swap file or a swap partition be mounted and read? Mr-Bisquit Linux - General 3 06-08-2009 02:16 PM
Hard Drive Partition Management - Mandriva Double Partition with Swap File partition moshebagelfresser Linux - Hardware 2 05-23-2008 10:46 AM
Newbie Installing Debian3 on m68k w/250M Partition Needs help creating swap partition AppleMac Linux - Newbie 2 11-01-2002 08:45 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration