LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2008, 11:05 PM   #1
GardarS
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Reykjavik,Iceland
Distribution: Centos 5.6 and Arch
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 17
Package/dependencie problem


Hello, I thought I had solved this issue entierly, but when I solved it I just created a few smaller ones instead.

This one is about media players, which I can not install when I try to install vlc the it says

Code:
Error: Missing Dependency: libdvdread.so.3 is needed by package vlc
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package vlc
and when I do a rpm -q on libdvdread it says

Code:
libdvdread-4.1.3-1.el5 is installed
the libcucul is supposed to be included in the libcaca package which I have installed.

now when I try to install xine it says

Code:
error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package xine
which is strange since it's said to be provided with libcaca :/

now the strangest one when I try to install mplayer

Code:
---> Package mplayer.i386 0:1.0-0.40.rc1try2.el5.rf set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: liblzo.so.1 for package: mplayer
--> Processing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 for package: mplayer
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: liblzo.so.1 is needed by package mplayer
Error: Missing Dependency: libcucul.so.0 is needed by package mplayer
when I try to install liblzo, it says it conflicts with another liblzo

Code:
 rpm -ivh liblzo2_2-2.03-6.el5.i386.rpm 
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
        file /usr/lib/liblzo2.so.2.0.0 from install of liblzo2_2-2.03-6.el5 conflicts with file from package lzo-2.02-2.el5.1
when I try to remove the liblzo2.so.2.0.0 it says it's not installed

Code:
rpm -e liblzo2.so.2.0.0
error: package liblzo2.so.2.0.0 is not installed

With thanks in advance, this is really driving me mad.
 
Old 12-14-2008, 11:24 PM   #2
zeno0771
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Northern IL
Distribution: Arch64
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 19
You don't mention which repo(s) you're using but it sounds an awful lot like what happens when you mix stuff from Livna with stuff from RPMForge or others. Media players and their specific libraries seem especially prone to this.
 
Old 12-14-2008, 11:33 PM   #3
GardarS
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Reykjavik,Iceland
Distribution: Centos 5.6 and Arch
Posts: 64

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Sorry forgot I belive theese are the ones.

Code:
 epel: mirror.karneval.cz
 * dries: ftp.belnet.be
 * dag: apt.sw.be
 * kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org
 * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de
 * updates: ftp.sunet.se
 * base: ftp.sunet.se
 * kbs-CentOS-Misc: centos.karan.org
 * addons: ftp.df.lth.se
 * centosplus: ftp.sunet.se
 * extras: ftp.df.lth.se
 
Old 12-15-2008, 02:10 PM   #4
zeno0771
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Northern IL
Distribution: Arch64
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 19
From what I'm seeing CentOS might have some of their apps configured slightly differently, similar to how Fedora does it (CentOS actually bears more resemblance to Fedora than RHEL). What I have done in this situation is address dependencies for each app one at a time. Remove the dependency in question and get both it and the app for which you're installing it from the same repo. Yes, there may be situations where you will have to remove another app; write it down and reinstall it from the same repo as well. You can go to many it not all of these repos on the web to see what they have available; if you can get away with getting everything you need from the same repo you should be good to go.
Don't worry, it's not as much work as it sounds.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
w32codecs dependencie tronica Debian 4 11-03-2006 03:32 PM
apt-get unmet dependencie and can't be fixed baosheng Linux - Software 2 05-27-2006 09:39 PM
How to ignore a dependencie when apt-getting a soft ? Stéphane Ascoët Debian 1 10-23-2004 12:09 PM
GLIBC_2.3 Dependencie for SuSE 8.0 SuSE_User Linux - Software 1 01-18-2004 08:23 PM
Dependencie Hell WMCrazyOne Linux - General 15 06-04-2003 07:45 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration