Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In MSDOS style partition table, there can be only 4 primary partitions or at most 3 primary partitions and one extended partition. Extended partitions hold logical partitions. All logical partitions start from 5. In this case there is only one primary partition sdc1. sdc2 is an extended partition. sdc5 to sdc16 are logical partitions of sdc2 extended partition.
Note: Please wrap posted output in [CODE] ... [/CODE] tags to preserve formatting.
I don't see anything wrong in the "fdisk -lu" output. The spacing between sdc11 and sdc12 is unusual, and I suppose some overly sensitive program might complain about sdc11 extending past the end of a 1MB boundary, but there is nothing actually wrong with that. I see nothing overlapping, and there is a gap between all partitions, the smallest being the 913 sectors between sdc11 and sdc12. (There is over 16GB of unused space between sdc15 and sdc16.)
Nothing to worry about. This type of nonsense gets spit out by some graphical applications when you start them from a command-line terminal. You can safely ignore it.
Incidentally, the general recommendation is to use “gksudo” instead of just “sudo” when you start a graphical application from the terminal as root—e.g.,
Code:
gksudo gparted
Not that it will suppress the nonsense, but people more knowledgeable than I am, will tell you that “sudo” may in such instances get you into trouble because it may cause the creation of files owned by “root” within your home directory. I don’t personally remember having encountered this issue, though. I do remember accidentally changing ownership of a part of my home directory tree to the “root” user once, and the results weren’t pretty.
And, by the way, as others have already suggested, there’s nothing wrong with your partitions.
A disk can have up to four “primary” partitions under the MBR scheme, numbered 1 through 4. If you want more than 4 partitions, then one of these partitions must be an “extended” partition. In your case, that’s partition number 2.
An extended partition is really just a container, into which you can create “logical” partitions. Logical partitions always have numbers starting at 5. They should be contained entirely within the extended partition, so when you look at their locations, they will seem to overlap with the extended partition. In actual fact, you cannot directly use the extended partition, but you will have to create one or more logical partitions within it in order to use its space.
Thanks for all the replies. It still said, "Can't have overlapping partitions." in the middle of all the instances of "GLib-CRITICAL **: Source ID ### was not found when attempting to remove it" I guess I can safely add Windows 10 tech preview and Ubuntu Mate 14.04 LTE when I have the time and am in the mood.
It still said, "Can't have overlapping partitions."
Hmmm... Looking closer to your partition list, I believe there may be a problem after all.
Your extended partition, “/dev/sdc2”, begins on sector 29298686. The first logical partition that it contains, “/dev/sdc5”, begins on sector 29298688—which is just 2 sectors into the container. I’m not sure if that’s a valid layout, since I seem to remember that an extended partition requires more free space at its beginning. In any case, when I attempt to create an extended partition, and accept the default values suggested by the “fdisk” utility, the first logical partition begins no less than 2048 sectors into the extended partition.
If possible, I would suggest you delete the “/dev/sdc5” partition and try to recreate it. In my opinion, there should be more free space at the beginning of the extended partition in order to arrive at a valid layout.
Your extended partition, “/dev/sdc2”, begins on sector 29298686. The first logical partition that it contains, “/dev/sdc5”, begins on sector 29298688—which is just 2 sectors into the container. I’m not sure if that’s a valid layout,
It's valid. I do that all the time. The extended partition header is just one sector.
I set up a drive with the exact size and partitioning shown in #18, and gparted (version 0.20.0, from SystemRescueCD) had no problem whatsoever with it.
I set up a drive with the exact size and partitioning shown in #18, and gparted (version 0.20.0, from SystemRescueCD) had no problem whatsoever with it.
Hmmm... Are we actually sure that the warning about overlapping partitions has anything to do with the disk that we're looking at? Couldn't the problem sit on another disk?
I added Windows 10 Tech Preview to the partition on sdb next to Win 8.1. I think it was sdb4 or sdb5. I then added Linux UbuntuMate 14.04 to sdc16. No issues. I will post the partition start and end points for the other two disks. Thanks for your continued support.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.