Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
08-25-2022, 08:00 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, X/ubuntu, MX Linux, OpenBSD, OpenWrt
Posts: 385
|
If you do as several here have suggested and leave KDE aside, but assuming you want some DE or WM + applications, my slightly related experience:
- SlackwareARM -current 32-bit (pre-15.0) with Xfce ran well on my Raspberrry Pi 4. (Upgrading to 15.0 32-bit, or to 15.0 or -current 64-bit, is still to do.)
- ArchLinuxARM 32-bit with Xfce is working well on a Chromebook, albeit after a lot of reading and messing around. I’d rather be running Slackware on it, but the instructions on the ArchLinuxARM wiki were quite straightforward, so I started with that. (Installing turned out to be much less straightforward after several updates since the original instructions were written. The hardware is not well supported, so I find it quite something that anything other than its now-unsupported ChromeOS can run on it at all. Hats off to those who figured out how to coax ArchLinuxARM to work on it.)
TKS
Last edited by TheTKS; 08-25-2022 at 08:02 PM.
|
|
|
08-26-2022, 10:30 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 4,059
|
This thread is from March.
Without a response to post #12 - or indeed any response at all - answering a question that wasn't even asked seems a waste of time...
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
08-28-2022, 06:54 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2018
Location: Silicon Valley
Distribution: Bodhi Linux
Posts: 1,762
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp
This thread is from March.
Without a response to post #12 - or indeed any response at all - answering a question that wasn't even asked seems a waste of time...
|
This thread could be referenced thousands of times by all those with 32-bit PC looking for good distro.
|
|
|
08-29-2022, 06:59 AM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 4,059
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma9o7
This thread could be referenced thousands of times by all those with 32-bit PC looking for good distro.
|
There are dozens of similar threads, many of them started by a single-post user who never returns to clarify.
The ones which receive thousands of views are those where details have been provided and the original poster has engaged in discussion - neither of which has happened here.
(The user who started this thread is a long-time LQ member who has been back, but has so far ignored the requests for further information.)
Without details, what's the point in doing anything beyond referencing https://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=Linux&status=Active&category=Old+Computers&architecture=ix86 ?
(For the benefit of anyone with the same needs, the only OS currently in that list meeting the KDE requirement appears to be Q4OS, running Trinity.)
Last edited by boughtonp; 08-29-2022 at 07:03 AM.
|
|
|
08-29-2022, 12:35 PM
|
#20
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE & OS/2 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 6,613
|
Trinity Desktop Environment
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp
For the benefit of anyone with the same needs, the only OS currently in that list meeting the KDE requirement appears to be Q4OS, running Trinity.
|
Trinity is available in binary packaging form (except where noted) for the following distros that offer 32bit variants: - Debian
- Devuan
- FreeBSD (not binaries)
- Mageia
- MX Linux
- openSUSE Tumbleweed
- Slackware
|
|
|
08-29-2022, 04:50 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 4,059
|
*shrug* I assume DistroWatch requires it to be packaged in official repos for it to count.
Otherwise, I guess someone would need to correct them.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|