New Debian-based Classic Gnome Desktop OS
For Classic Gnome lovers and Desktop users everywhere it is worth giving SolusOS a test run in a spare part of your hard drive.
SolusOS is reviewed here: http://www.linuxandlife.com/2012/05/...me-debian.html I have tried it and it is very impressive. It is Debian based and, like Mint, has all the multimedia etc included. Ikey Doherty of SolusOS comments: “We'll be using Gnome 3 classic mode with a lot of modifications. It will look and act exactly the same as our Gnome 2 setup, requiring no hardware acceleration. I've begun porting the older panel/applet libraries to use GTK3 and D-BUS meaning we won't lose any of the functionality previously found. Long story short, you'll be using the latest system and you won't be able to tell the difference". SolusOS also has a First Run wizard with firewall and graphics driver options. I only had one problem and that was with flash crashing. There is a simple solution however. In terminal: Code:
sudo rm /etc/adobe/mms.cfg |
Hi there,
Quote:
Quote:
[X] Doc CPU |
Quote:
Now the SolusOS people are doing that, nice, good news for people that like Gnome 2. |
Hi there,
Quote:
There's the Windows OS itself. In my assessment, Windows reached its optimum with Windows XP. So I'll stay with XP and won't update any more. There's Microsoft Office, which reached its peak with Office 97, after which it constantly decayed. So I'll stay with Office 97 (besides using Open Office) and won't update any further. And that's what I demand: Once a piece of software has reached a degree of maturity, recognition, approval and prevalence, it shouldn't be changed any more (except bug fixes). If you change a significant property of the software, it's gonna be a different product. Quote:
[X] Doc CPU |
The point is Gnome 2 is dead upstream, and over time will more than likely have security issues. Not that Gnome 2 was great and Gnome 3 sucks. Using any software that is no longer being maintain is just plain stupid.
Even Debian will stop using Gnome 2 once Wheezy is released next year. |
TobiSGD,
Quote:
Doc CPU, Quote:
I am looking forward to the SolusOS next incarnation, OS-2. I have just discovered this link to an earlier review of SolusOS which gives useful background information on Ikey Doherty, who was the driving force behind LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition): http://www.mikeermel.com/ Extract: "What Ikey has decided to do is to provide a rock-solid foundation for SolusOS, which is based on Debian Squeeze. And instead of trying to bring in new desktop environments, SolusOS is using GNOME 2.30, which gives everyone a familiar GNOME 2 environment that is also very stable. But where SolusOS really shines is how it provides a steady foundation, but uses current releases of software packages. So everyone using SolusOS is getting the best of both worlds — a very stable distro that offers current and fresh applications". |
All the Gnome nonsense caused me to switch to LXDE (e.g. Lubuntu). My computers are fast again.
|
I love Gnome 2.x and it's great to see some distro's still using it but, nothing lasts forever. I have switched from Ubuntu 10.10 to my own homebuilt distro running Debian Testing/Sid with XFCE and its as good as Gnome ever was. The recently released XFCE 4.10 will give an even better experience once it reaches the main distro's out there. As always with Linux it's choice, if unsatisfied with a certained product then move on and try something else...
|
I tried Solus last week and gave it 8/10 in my review on this site. I'm not so sure about their idea of customising Gnome 3 in next year's release, though. Messing about with a desktop can often have unfortunate results, as I'm currently finding with ROSA's take on KDE.
As for security issues in Gnome 2, Red Hat will be supporting it until the end of the decade, so I expect they'll sort something out. Personally, I think all the new gimmickry is rubbish. GUIs have been around since 1973, so it's reasonable to think that the ergonomics were well sorted out before Gnome 3 and Unity came along. But who cares? We've got Xfce and Mate. |
David McCann,
I liked your review of SolusOS at: http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...p?product=2168 and I agree that the installer could be improved. Several Linux OSs fall down in this area. The Ubuntu installer is one of the best IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
RedHat releases the sources to all of their software, and it's pretty simple to pull and merge them when necessary. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is why I love open source. That was bad, but the developers don't (want to) see it, so some people take it up and try to make it better. A whole bunch of distros, including Ubuntu and Mint, wouldn't exist if there wouldn't be a desire to make it better. Of course we could make the applications to use GTK2 forever. The question is: Why? Why don't we still use KDE 3? Or XFCE 4.2? Time goes on. Go with it. Or use twm, pure experience, no progression. |
Quote:
MATE, Firefox, Thunderbird, Tomboy, Banshee, Pidgin, GIMP, and many other mainline applications still build against it. Will they in the future? *shrug* It is a respectable amount of work to migrate applications from GTK 2 to GTK 3, it's going to take a while to port them. They do today though, a year after GNOME 2 "died". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
FYI - Trinity is a KDE 3 fork, MATE is a GNOME 2 fork, and XFCE 4.10 is still GTK2. ;) |
Thanks for your reply to my previous post. I'll look further into that.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM. |