LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-22-2019, 05:32 AM   #1
DaRkBoDoM
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 84

Rep: Reputation: 17
KDE to Gnome


Hi there,

i have been a KDE user for many years. Sadly, one by one, the apps i was used to loved stopped working.
Today i realized i still run KDE Plasma, but i'm not using any of its apps any more, so i'm thinking on switching to Gnome, since Plasma itself has some annoying bugs.

Anyway, i have been looking at the actual Gnome3 and i do not like its interface. Is there a way to have the latest gnome with the classing "start" button, app menu, task bar, tray bar, etc…?
 
Old 05-22-2019, 05:53 AM   #2
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,126

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
Probably Mate desktop is what you're looking for as an integrated solution.
Maybe you could do it yourself with themes.
 
Old 05-22-2019, 06:03 AM   #3
DaRkBoDoM
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
It looks nice, but i would like to switch to GNOME because it is mainstream and is a stable and mature project.

If i have to fall in yet another buggy niche DE, i can stick to KDE
 
Old 05-22-2019, 06:16 AM   #4
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,126

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
Your choice. I predominantly use gnome3 in Fedora, my better half uses Mate on Mint. No discernible difference in stability/usability.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-22-2019, 07:13 AM   #5
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
MATE buggy and niche. Sigh. Have you been locked away in a cave for the last ten years?

The large number of users who use this stable, solid, intuitive, Gtk3+-based desktop environment will carry on benefiting from the talents of its developers.

Good luck on finding a DE that is both GNOME and not-GNOME at the same time. I would suggest Cinnamon, but you would no doubt call that buggy and niche as well.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-22-2019, 07:26 AM   #6
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
Mate` has been around for years and is anything but buggy and unstable. Mate` is a fork of Gnome 2 actually, before Gnome became the buggy, unstable mess it is today. If I had to use a DE, I would pick between 2: Mate` or Xfce4 because both of them just work and have never presented me with any issues. That's my personal experience though.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-22-2019, 07:39 AM   #7
DaRkBoDoM
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
I have never used Mate and i didn't mean to hurt anyone's sensibility; anyway, if you are saying it is "as stable as xfce", that's not stable enough for me: i've been using xfce4 for some months and had to switch back to KDE because Thunar had lots of problems and lacked basic features.

I do not dual boot on Linux once in a while just to have some fun: it is my main and only OS, i use it every day for many hours, so, from my point of view, stable means stable for real. To somebody using a DE once in a while, any DE looks stable enough indeed.
 
Old 05-22-2019, 07:48 AM   #8
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
I agree thunar is lacking features compared to Dolphin - dolphin is simply the most feature filled file manager I have ever used, with the exception of xfe, but that's a dual pane and probably not to most people's liking.

If you think thunar is lacking in features, you will be very disappointed with nautilus. The gnome devs have succeeded in neutering the file manager so badly it is nearly just a viewer for files and doesn't do much else.

I have had (personally) stability issues with gnome and also performance issues. People use it for sure, but since the new UI 10+ years ago, I have never liked it. Again, that's a personal choice though.

I have used Linux as my desktop for nearly 20 years, until about a year ago so I understand where you are coming from. I would be using KDE now, but I also find it buggy and I can't stand having my computer give me issues - drives me nuts.
 
Old 05-22-2019, 07:50 AM   #9
hydrurga
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Pictland
Distribution: Linux Mint 21 MATE
Posts: 8,048
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925Reputation: 2925
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaRkBoDoM View Post
I have never used Mate and i didn't mean to hurt anyone's sensibility; anyway, if you are saying it is "as stable as xfce", that's not stable enough for me: i've been using xfce4 for some months and had to switch back to KDE because Thunar had lots of problems and lacked basic features.

I do not dual boot on Linux once in a while just to have some fun: it is my main and only OS, i use it every day for many hours, so, from my point of view, stable means stable for real. To somebody using a DE once in a while, any DE looks stable enough indeed.
No sensibilities hurt. I personally just think that you don't have a realistic view about desktop environments.

I use Mint MATE on my production machine and have done so for several years, and that includes web development, software development, editing (books, research papers etc.), and the running of Windows virtual machines. You are not the only one who works for a living and uses Linux full-time in that pursuit.

So from an initial stance of writing off desktop environments without even trying them, you're now writing off advice on using them due to the fact that you think people offering these opinions, not me but in general, use desktop environments only "from time to time". You do realise that you are posting on a Linux forum and receiving advice from folk who are solidly experienced in using Linux as their daily driver?

If you don't mind me saying so, you're missing out on a whole lot of the world, and will have your decision-making adversely affected, by having such pre-conceived non-tested "defensive" opinions.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-22-2019, 08:07 AM   #10
DaRkBoDoM
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrurga View Post
So from an initial stance of writing off desktop environments without even trying them, you're now writing off advice on using them due to the fact that you think people offering these opinions, not me but in general, use desktop environments only "from time to time". You do realise that you are posting on a Linux forum and receiving advice from folk who are solidly experienced in using Linux as their daily driver?

If you don't mind me saying so, you're missing out on a whole lot of the world, and will have your decision-making adversely affected, by having such pre-conceived non-tested "defensive" opinions.
So, you pretend to know me, interesting.

I did not open a thread asking on advice for which desktop environment is best, because i well know how such threads are going to end up. I asked advice on how to adapt Gnome 3 to my needs, if possible.

You went OT, and now you are complaining about my attitude: i'm just trying to get the best out of a bad answer, that's not pre-conceived, you just proven to be a bad advisor
 
Old 05-22-2019, 08:12 AM   #11
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
Gnome 3 can work for you, but as I mentioned, the file manager is very rudimentary. You may end up installed another file manager and using that instead.

Or maybe just use gnome as is and see how you like it - you may find it works just fine. Coming from KDE, that may not be the case though, because IMHO, KDE has a richer feature set than gnome.

Look into addons for gnome if you wish to change the UI a bit - there are ones that give it a "gnome 2" feel. Just be advised that some of the addons can cause stability issues, plus many of them are tied to a specific gnome version, or at least advertised to only work on a particular version.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-22-2019, 07:54 PM   #12
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,323
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141
I have used MATE off and on for quite a while and find it quite stable.
 
Old 05-26-2019, 03:22 AM   #13
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,808
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066
If you really like how KDE used to be, and like maturity, you should give TDE a looksee.
 
Old 05-26-2019, 03:44 AM   #14
scasey
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Distribution: CentOS 7.9.2009
Posts: 5,727

Rep: Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211
I’m just a newbie* using Linux on a desktop...to the point where I jump back to Windows when there’s a time crunch.
That said: my desktop ‘puter is running CentOS 7 — I abandoned KDE and installed cinnamon. I’m happy with that.

*I have been administering web servers since 1999 using the CLI via ssh.
 
Old 05-31-2019, 10:23 AM   #15
tredegar
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora38
Posts: 6,147

Rep: Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435Reputation: 435
Quote:
Anyway, i have been looking at the actual Gnome3 and i do not like its interface. Is there a way to have the latest gnome with the classing "start" button, app menu, task bar, tray bar, etc…?
Yes, you can change a whole number of things on the default desktop. Go to https://extensions.gnome.org/ and look at / install some of the many extensions available. Once installed, they usually take effect immediately.

Then there is, of course, gnome-tweak-tool which helps you get your desktop the way you like it.

I much prefer nemo as my default file manager. YMMV.

Please give these things a try.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE weird issue on Debian: KDE tries to run GNOME without giving KDE features..? ritesht93 Linux - Software 3 06-23-2015 02:14 AM
Kde to Gnome to Kde. Full circle. What happened to the Gnome I loved? fair_is_fair Linux - General 7 08-12-2012 11:50 AM
uninstall kde 4 & gnome 2.20 and install kde 3.5 or gnome 1.x on suse 10.3 laucian Linux - Newbie 2 04-07-2008 01:01 PM
KDE apps crash on Gnome, Gnome apps work on my KDE - Gnome/KDE integration Happy Gimper Linux - Software 0 03-18-2008 09:28 AM
Aborted KDE 3.5.1 Install while using KDE 3.4 and KDE and Gnome Won't Boot cheetahman SUSE / openSUSE 5 03-04-2006 11:03 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration