Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Are you using your wm without taskbar?
Is a taskbar really necessary, such as kicker, tint2, ... gnome-panel? Could you use your WM without any Taskbar ?
If yes, please explain how or better give us a cool screenshot of your high-tech desktop.
thanks!
I use Xmonad (a tiling WM) with no taskbar and multiple monitors. I just leave it in fullscreen mode (one app per monitor) and switch between apps quickly with keyboard shortcuts. There is no taskbar or status bar or anything else... just the windows.
I like having a panel, but if I could use kwin with something that I could access launchers from like nautilus or something, I think I could live quite comfortably with the expose effect enabled.
You really use this Desktop. It is very simple Desktop. You like it?
Yes, I tend bounce between vtwm and fvwm2, but once I figured out how to configure FvwmIconBox I tend to stick with that "desktop" most of the time. Note, that look is quite close to mwm (xwinman.org), but the keyboard accelerators are different.
Im using tint2 with Openbox, and the one that comes with Blackbox, but back in the day when I start with GNU/Linux the WM in my computer was WindowMaker so no bars, in some of my old machines i have Wmii or Dwm which has no task bar, kicker or panels.
I could live w/o any of them, handy but not really necessary.
Anyone like the new type of taskbar offered by Windows 7?
I wouldn't call that new, it pretty much resembles what AWN does. But no, I don't like it, but I don't like this type of panel anyways.
I use i3 with the statusbar, showing my the workspaces in use, so that I don't miss urgency hints and for showing my systray icons. the rest of the bar is filled by Conky with the usual statistics, like CPU usage, network traffic and so on.
I wouldn't call that new, it pretty much resembles what AWN does. But no, I don't like it, but I don't like this type of panel anyways.
I use i3 with the statusbar, showing my the workspaces in use, so that I don't miss urgency hints and for showing my systray icons. the rest of the bar is filled by Conky with the usual statistics, like CPU usage, network traffic and so on.
Yes, I have tried dwm, but I don't like it.
I also have tried awesome, Xmonad and wmii, but found that i3 is the WM that is exactly what I want:
- very flexible layout
- easy configurable with textfiles instead of having to learn Lua or Haskell (wmii is at least configurable using Bash scripts)
- in-place restart of the WM if you have changed the configuration, so that your running applications are not affected
- filter rules for which application to start on which workspace and named workspaces
- very helpful developer (answers most of the time within a day when I file a bugreport or post to the very active mailing list)
- and more that doesn't I forget now
Yes, I have tried dwm, but I don't like it.
I also have tried awesome, Xmonad and wmii, but found that i3 is the WM that is exactly what I want:
- very flexible layout
- easy configurable with textfiles instead of having to learn Lua or Haskell (wmii is at least configurable using Bash scripts)
- in-place restart of the WM if you have changed the configuration, so that your running applications are not affected
- filter rules for which application to start on which workspace and named workspaces
- very helpful developer (answers most of the time within a day when I file a bugreport or post to the very active mailing list)
- and more that doesn't I forget now
I'd also add:
- excellent multi-monitor support
- emacs-style modes allowing for mode-specific keybindings
- the scratchpad feature
I use KDE, with 4 panels, 3 of which are hidden. screenshot here. I don't go to the taskbar very often, all the apps I need I launch using krunner, window switching done with alt+tab. The taskbar is there mostly in case an app wants to notify of some event (more like persistent notifications).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.