Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2006, 09:06 PM   #1
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 77

Rep: Reputation: 15
BAN and Don't use NOVELL GNU/Linux,1895...MNL103006EP17A

Both Novell and Microsoft have patent portfolios on their Proprietary codes. But FOSS does not have a patent portfolio only copyleft and whatever FOSS License it use. Both Novell and microsoft shall be helping each other to improve interoperability of ODF and OXML among other things. Remember the Microsoft holds the right for royalty fees on OXML.

The problem will occur when Novell knows about Microsoft Technology and contributes to GPL'd/LGPL'd Softwares (i.e. OpenOffice). It's just hard to keep track on how clean Novell's code contribution from patent infringement. When working with a GPL'd code you are working with the community and cannot narrow the rights on the code to a selected vendor(s). With the involved threat it would make it ineffective for Novell to contribute to GPL or FOSS projects. This bans them the right to continue using GPL code; as part of the Principle is to distribute code without additional restrictions.

Microsoft will wait and squeal when code from Novell will take clout into major FOSS projects and they can claim any patent infringement, under the sun against, any FOSS projects they choose. That's the bottom line.

Microsoft need to do drop down all patents claims against all FOSS projects; do a public statement and give specific patent portfolios. Until then, stay away from all Novell solutions and contributions; better yet, revoke their right to use FOSS code because of the imminent threat it imposes on the ecology of FOSS. This can happen with project leaders making the effective steps.

Remember folks..... it's still war for Microsoft. Declaring that they do not enforce patent claims against those who contribute unpaid and for Novell. This mean that they want to destroy the ecology of FOSS by rendering programmers jobless and without an income. That is not the idea of FOSS. FREE is not about Price it's about FREEDOM. A programmer gets paid because he/she has the capability to drive the technology. If a programmer is dismissed, by virtue of GPL, he/she has the right to continue to contribute or create his own bundle of solution.

Old 11-04-2006, 12:43 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 75
Please post your thread in only one forum. Posting a single thread in the most relevant forum will make it easier for members to help you and will keep the discussion in one place. This thread is being closed because it is a duplicate.

Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BAN and Don't use NOVELL GNU/Linux nbjayme Linux - General 6 11-04-2006 02:43 AM
LXer: Linux Australia has a petition to "Ban Piracy, Not Competition" LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-22-2006 06:21 PM
Novell Linux Desktop 10 beta 8 and novell client problem mklim Linux - Software 0 04-18-2006 03:31 PM
LXer: Chinese no OS ban may open way for Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-17-2006 12:54 PM
GNU/Linux vs. GNU/OpenSolaris win32sux Linux - Software 5 11-27-2005 10:10 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration