Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi,
I have been trying out several different linux distros, as possible replacements
for windows 98 on a 400 MHz machine.
I've been running live CDs mostly, to try out the different distros.
Something I have found is that after running a distro for a while, it seems to stop launching some applications.
Specifically, I'm usually running from the "start menu" of whatever desktop, and I select something,
and nothing ever seems to appear.
No error message, no lockup, just acted like I didn't click anything.
Oddly, it seems like some programs I can run once or a few times,
but after a period of use (an hour or so) I end up less able to run things.
This has happened in different distros.
I am suspecting some piece of my hardware, possibly, but I'm not sure how to diagnose where.
Any suggestions?
Also - is there a good method to tell what is really happening when I try to launch a program and it
dies quietly like this?
any tips appreciated.
Are live CDs known to be more problematic than hard disk installs?
FYI:
This machine will be used by my kids when ready (they are 5 and 7), so I'm looking for
stable and pretty GUI oriented usage.
Distros I am trying:
edubuntu <-- I like this because of the kid focus and preinstalled packages, but the performance is lackluster on this older machine, and I was even able to completely get it locked up, requiring a hard reset.
xubuntu
PClinuxOS
Damn small linux
Madriva 2006
Fedora Core 6
Vector linux 5.1.1
I am suspecting some piece of my hardware, possibly, but I'm not sure how to diagnose where.
Any suggestions?
RAM. CD-ROM Drive + CPU
Live distros run from a ramdisk. This is restricted by your RAM. The smaller the ram the longer it takes to launch anything, and some things will not run at all. Further, as you change things around, you'll be storing settings in the ramdisk that would normally go to the HDD. Thus using up your disk-space.
Speed are important too - small RAM size will require much toing and froing between memory and CD-ROM.
You can find out more by running your test applications from the commandline. Many of them will have a verbose option or even a debug option which will likely tell you more than you can decipher or need.
I have ~390M of RAM in there, which I was thinking should be plenty.
Several distros are aiming at running on 128, 64, or even less RAM.
But point well taken on the liveCD issue. - that probably is chewing up lots of RAM space,
that could be sitting on a drive instead.
I'll start evaluating off a hard drive now that I've had a taste, and see if things
improve.
I actually had tried Puppy linux, but it just didn't seem as "together" as some of
the other lightweight options. I had declined that one already.
I am still hoping for that "easy to admin" aspect, which is nicely built into some of the bigger
distros.
Just a quick note about the statement "I'm looking for stable and pretty GUI oriented usage." (is that 'pretty' "nice looking" or "fairly"? I'll assume the latter).
My kids are 2 and 4, and we use Window Maker (with dock and clip removed). They have much less problems getting around with it than most adults. For example, my daughter (the eldest) isn't the least bit fazed that there isn't a taskbar, knows how to zoom in and out using Ctrl-Alt-'+' and -'-', launches applications without a "Start" menu button, etc.
Actually I'm afraid that if I switch to a GUI with a task bar she won't want to go back to Window Maker. Maybe I should try it out for a while...
Personally I think kids are ready to use computers when they're around 2 years old.
First, try swapping out or simply reducing memory, 1 stick at a time. That is a very likely cause. Also, be sure your cooler is tight on the processor, it can overheat to cause this and ultimate total system freeze. While you're in there, be sure all your cards and cables are in real tight.
After that, you'r motherboard is most likely culprit.
I have ~390M of RAM in there, which I was thinking should be plenty.
Several distros are aiming at running on 128, 64, or even less RAM.
But point well taken on the liveCD issue. - that probably is chewing up lots of RAM space,
that could be sitting on a drive instead.
I'll start evaluating off a hard drive now that I've had a taste, and see if things
improve.
I actually had tried Puppy linux, but it just didn't seem as "together" as some of
the other lightweight options. I had declined that one already.
I am still hoping for that "easy to admin" aspect, which is nicely built into some of the bigger
distros.
thanks for the tips!
Gastroman
It really doesn't matter what distro you run if you do not have enough memory then you are going to run out of memory even if you put it on a hard drive with a swap, because if you swap file is not big enough then it get full and you have the same problem the least that you should have to get those fancy GUI'S is .5 gig. and a swap file of 1.5 gig. Which all distros will not read.
Then you are looking for one of the debian varients.
I would agree. After starting off w/ RPM based systems, I have become very impressed with the ease of administering a Debian system.
And I also agree that you may have just marginally enough RAM, but I think the situation would improve greatly with a harddrive install. I'm running MEPIS on a box w/ 256 megs RAM and it works pretty well. 512 is always better, tho.
I have now installed Edubuntu on HDD, and indeed it is running MUCH better.
Maybe not optimal with the 390M, but definitely usable.
I was trying out 7 or 8 apps at one time, playing audio and video clips off web sites, and it was tolerable.
So far, no missing apps.
That's about all that I had hoped for from this older machine.
I wonder though, if I might be better off with a different windows manager/desktop.
This uses GNOME.
I think that's the next thing I need to understand better.
Thanks again for the tips - I'll have to look closer at Debian, too...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.