GrafpupThis forum is for the discussion of Grafpup Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've downloaded grafpup2 dillo and the screen size doesn't cover the whole monitor size. In other words the desktop seems to be wrapped with black borders.
I've changed the xorg.conf with the puppy one that works but still the same problem. Didn't happened with a previous alpha version.
This is not the first time I have this problem, the same happens to me with arch linux.Maybe the video card driver I have an ati rage pro fury
cf13 I often compare different operating systems on the same computer and monitor by using plug-in hard drives.
Frequently the automated XOrg setup decides to do its own customisation of horizontal and vertical scanning rates as well as the number of pixels in each direction. Each seems to be slightly different and needs a tweak with horizonal and vertical centering and width/height.
The fact there is a black border around the image suggests to me that the scanning of the monitor CRT isn't there.
It might be good to try some other resolution. I usually go for 1280x1024x16-bit for starters.
You could also see if the XVesa driver does anything for you.
I've noticed problems with some SiS and some Intel video chips on some OS's with some monitors. Even commercial OS's can do this, as I discovered with Sun Java Desktop for Linux v2 - the drivers in the live CD worked properly whereas those in the installed version identified one chipset incorrectly.
Short of trying and recording here what the results were so someone can look at them and offer suggestions, I'm fresh out of ideas, sorry.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.