GentooThis forum is for the discussion of Gentoo Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi Gentoo people! Archer bothers you again.
In Arch programs in official repos are vanilla, it's well known. And in Debian/Fedora — as we know it — they patch programs heavily. What about Gentoo? Do maintainers patch programs in Gentoo's repos or place them there vanilla?
It depends on the package, and the package maintainer.
AFAIK, the policy is to put the packages as vanilla as possible, but some times trivial patches are needed to adjust to the distro init system, the fs layout or the package manager.
In some packages you can find a "vanilla" USE flag that serves this purpose. Other USE flags for concrete packages might influence how the code is patched (or not).
For the kernel you have a separate package. The regular Gentoo patched kernel is "gentoo-sources", while the vanilla sources as from kernel.org are called "vanilla-sources".
There are very few packages for ANY Linux distribution that are 100% vanilla. Even distributions like Slackware often maintain some patches to promote better compatibility between dependencies and programs. Usually, only the Linux kernel is about the most untouched package though some distributions use a few packages here and there, some none at all.
Patches can help, but equally they can hurt so often, you do want to avoid patching unless absolutely necessary.
I disagree. Even in Arch kernel is not vanilla. You can find vanilla kernel in AUR, but by default it's patched. But programs are pretty much all vanilla. So it's quite the opposite of what you said.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.