LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2005, 07:31 AM   #1
Murdock1979
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware Debian VectorLinux
Posts: 429
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 30
Windows XP service pack 2


Hello All!

Can someone please explain to me why the service pack 2 for windows XP recommends backing up the system and take many precautions just in case it does not work?

On my Slackware OS, updating packages and security are all modulized and unless you're recompiling the kernel, the system operation is never compromised. Why is Windows XP different?

thanks,
mords
 
Old 07-12-2005, 07:36 AM   #2
fouldsy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: St Louis, MO
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,284

Rep: Reputation: 47
Windows XP SP2 also added in a lot of security features which quite heavily modifed the core system. As a result, initially a number of device drivers and software components would not function with this until the manufacturers caught up and released updates and patches. Am not gonna start flaming Microsoft, but generally their code contains a lot more bugs than Linux does, or at least, a lot more apparant bugs, and generally they always have an archive function before applying service packs to quickly restore the system. Guess they know problems are likely to occur and so build a way to restore the system! Only needed it once with Sp2, and once on a Win 2k machine after applying SP4, but their base design structures do seem to differ anyway.
 
Old 07-12-2005, 07:47 AM   #3
Murdock1979
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware Debian VectorLinux
Posts: 429
Blog Entries: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Interesting.

But I still don't understand why there needs to be so much core modification? I have Linux for over two years now and not once did I need to update anything "core". You've got the kernel that needs minor tinkering now and then, but by far, almost virtually all security issues don't change any part of the core.
 
Old 07-12-2005, 08:33 AM   #4
xgreen
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware,Ubuntu
Posts: 389

Rep: Reputation: 30
is this windowsquestions.org forum ??...:-)
 
Old 07-12-2005, 08:58 AM   #5
tangle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Smithville, TN
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,744

Rep: Reputation: 70
Almost all Windows upgrade effect the core. Ever wonder why you have to reboot when you install a driver or software? It is because those programs and drivers write over critical OS files (.dll and such).

This is in my opion is the major difference between Windows and UNIX type OS. I honesty do not know why Windows was built like that and I do not know why they still do it. Why would you let someone else write a core part of your OS? There is no control or should I say overwatch of what is being wrote.

Like you said, when you install a driver or program (short of a kernel patch), the driver or program does not write to the heart of the OS. Also I think there is a lot to do with a big company and the amount of people working on the OS. Windows 3.x ran stable. Then MS started to get big and worried more about money than doing the job right. The guys that work in most open source prodject do it with a lot of pride. I believe that they feel their work represents who they are and they take pride in it. Or maybe they are out to prove something. But pride in your work has a lot to do with things being done write. It is mor than just collecting a pay check. I could go on and on.
 
Old 07-12-2005, 09:04 AM   #6
leadazide
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Germany
Distribution: SuSE 11.0, Ubuntu 7.10
Posts: 390

Rep: Reputation: 30
nazmin: Yes. Check the URL
 
Old 07-12-2005, 09:08 AM   #7
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Moved: More suitable in General, not Linux - General.
 
Old 07-12-2005, 10:48 AM   #8
phil.d.g
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,192

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
Re: Windows XP service pack 2

Quote:
Originally posted by Murdock1979
Hello All!

Can someone please explain to me why the service pack 2 for windows XP recommends backing up the system and take many precautions just in case it does not work?

On my Slackware OS, updating packages and security are all modulized and unless you're recompiling the kernel, the system operation is never compromised. Why is Windows XP different?

thanks,
mords
You've answered your own question, windows recommends backing data up incase the upgrade doesn't work. Mr Bill Gates is probably covering himself too, if someone turns round and say "I updated my system to service pack2 and then the computer crashed and I lost all my pictures from last Christmas, I'm gonna sue you" then Mr B. Gates can turn round and say "We told you to back your data up first". Of course it doesn't work quite like that, but you get the idea
 
Old 07-12-2005, 11:05 AM   #9
jaz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: midwest
Distribution: fedora core 1
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6
you're talking about 2 different operating systems all together. Linux and Windows are not designed the same. You do know this.


Anyway its a precaution in case something happens. For instance my girlfriend installed SP2 and after that she could no longer burn CD's. When she uninstalled SP2 all was well.
 
Old 07-12-2005, 11:13 AM   #10
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,458

Rep: Reputation: 45
That reminds me, I've got gigs of backup files on my HD from my gf's upgrade to SP2. . . It must be safe to wipe them by now
 
Old 07-12-2005, 11:24 AM   #11
phil.d.g
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,192

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
If you delete them now she'll be ringing you in an hour saying her computers crashed big styleee, lol
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mandatory Service Pack 2 coming tuesday ?? BajaNick General 6 04-17-2005 07:59 PM
Missing Service Pack riluve Red Hat 4 01-25-2005 10:01 AM
smb printer sharing and service pack 2 brainlesspinkey Mandriva 2 10-17-2004 05:26 PM
which service pack is installed? mbhenry Linux - Software 0 11-26-2003 11:55 AM
Service Pack Download ? norm Linux - Newbie 5 01-11-2002 09:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration