GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Good to know that in the community our sense of Humor hasn't diminished.. I was laughing after reading almost every post... Nice way to cheer up a geek.
I think that "out of the box" gives varied levels of security...let's take two extremes, for instance...
M$ Windows XP is designed with security as an after-thought...you install, then you get to tweaking stuff and installing security programs. Out of the box, very insecure.
OpenBSD is designed with security in mind...you install, then you spend time opening up the services you want to make available. Yeah, you'll spend a lot of time making the machine usable, but "out of the box" it's vastly more secure than Windows XP.
Either way, you're spending time after install to balance security and functionality.
The most secure OS in the world is the one that isn't connected to any network.
That's not totally true, only partially.
The most secure OS is the one that is not connected to any network and is also powered off, with no physical access to the machine. That's the only way an OS is secure in my opinion..
Exactly, I mean, look at that network security admin video "Mission Impossible". They had that one in a room off the network with lasers and yet someone still got in. If they'd had sharks in the ventilation ducts they'd have been fine, but they scrimped and look what happened.
So you need technical security, physical security, lasers and sharks to make the system properly secure.
Nope - that's a single point of failure in my book. What is the laser beam is reflected bac at the shark with a handy mirror? or if the shark is looking in the wrong direction? No, sharks AND lasers give that extra level of redundancy which allows me to sleep safely in my bed.
Well, as safely as one can with laser beams and sharks all over the place.
Only use piranhas when your porcupine has eaten so much that the shark complains. Remember: fish aren't unionised and can be replaced whenever you feel like it.
Only use piranhas when your porcupine has eaten so much that the shark complains.
I don't know why, but for some reason that sounds like brilliant advice.
Thats what I'm going to tell everyone who asks a question related to the balance between security and convenience and it'll sound like I'm saying something.
And if they ask what I means, I'll say "Pester not the man guarding the barbed fence. Theres a tcp for every ip."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.