GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i became a profession windows installer (self titled). I have done some crazy installs and fdisking . my favorite is getting around upgrade versions of the newer osess by installing win98 1st. but i dont deal with it anymore. 2 many lame service packs. you cant even install win2k server and have time to download the IIS patches before the damn thing gets code red or nimda or something.
I was watching The Screen Savers the other day and they were talking about msblaster. This guy had the bug and formatted the drive and reinstalled. When he connected to the net, he had the virus before he could install the patch.
I laughed so hard I feel out of the bed.
I guess you would have to work at it pretty hard for Linux to get a virus. Never had one so I'm not sure.
I get my practice working on everybody else's puter. I like when they ask if I have 'the same problem' they have. I smile and say 'no', I have a REAL system. Let them wonder usually.
Well, my main box with rh9 had problems for awhile and I was forced to use an older computer with 98 on it. Now that rh9 is running again, I will try to get the older computer set up with a linux distro so I will not have to go through that again.
Distribution: CentOS 3.3-4, OpenBSD 3.3, Fedora Core 4, Ubuntu, Novell Open Enterprise Server
Posts: 213
Rep:
Well I really got a kick out of the big blue E that showed up on my Gnome desktop when I installed Office 2000 using wine
IE actually works under linux!
and they will take only IE, unfortunately. I ordinarily use konqueror, or Mozilla.
I am really quite a newbie, and I'm not sure how to get answers off of this site, so if anyone has an answer, would you please email me at einfeldt@earthlink.net? Or you could call me at 415 351 1300. Thanks in advance!
To drag this back to the original thread, why is it so ridiculous to run IE on linux? (For testing purposes i mean). There are such discrepencies in terms of rendering between mozilla and ie, even between mozilla and opera, and lets face it, most people on the web haven't caught on to firebird and are using IE on windows. If you want to make a site that's attractive, legible even, for most people, you'll need to at least check the site with ie. Unfortunately i can't check mine, but i'd like to.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.