LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2002, 07:49 PM   #1
purpleburple
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware8.1
Posts: 332

Rep: Reputation: 30
what's all the fuss about Linux fonts?


Hi. Why is everyone always talking about how Linux's fonts
don't look as good as microsoft's? they look alright to me. Is the fuss about the actual design of the font or the way it's pixelated in X?




thanks

Last edited by purpleburple; 12-19-2002 at 07:51 PM.
 
Old 12-19-2002, 11:40 PM   #2
DavidPhillips
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,163

Rep: Reputation: 58
a lot of people like truetype fonts, and don't know they can change them
 
Old 12-20-2002, 12:15 PM   #3
bkeating
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Distribution: Open/FreeBSD, Gentoo, SuSE
Posts: 511

Rep: Reputation: 38
what ARE true type fonts really? and what does gnu/linux use? I know nothing about fonts (and im a graphics monkey, go figure) where are fonts in GNU/Linux installed?

I heard a while back about how fonts for GNU/Linux are crappy because they offer terrible anti alias support. my Gnome desktop looks sexxy...

whatchoo talkin about foo?
 
Old 12-20-2002, 02:53 PM   #4
yadavankur
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Jaipur
Distribution: muLinux
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
I dont know about fonts But the Icons (.ico files) look better in Linux. If the Linux guys can make .ico files look better how come thay have probs with fonts.
besides I never felt Linux fonts dont look good.

Last edited by yadavankur; 12-20-2002 at 03:20 PM.
 
Old 12-20-2002, 03:14 PM   #5
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,692

Rep: Reputation: 45
alot of fonts are copyrighted, and can only be used if a licence/royalty is bought/paid. i agree, i've never noticed that my fonts look bad.
 
Old 12-21-2002, 01:36 AM   #6
KnightAbel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Kaysville, UT USA
Distribution: Red Hat Linux, Slackware
Posts: 242

Rep: Reputation: 30
In some cases, my linux fonts look better than my windows ones.
 
Old 12-21-2002, 04:44 AM   #7
DavidPhillips
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,163

Rep: Reputation: 58
MAn i ReaLlY LoVE mY lInuX fonts

oN A miCroShAFt MachIne tHiS WouLD LooK mEsSeD Up bUt noT oN lInUx

Last edited by DavidPhillips; 12-21-2002 at 04:46 AM.
 
Old 12-21-2002, 12:48 PM   #8
yadavankur
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Jaipur
Distribution: muLinux
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
oN A miCroShAFt MachIne tHiS WouLD LooK mEsSeD Up bUt noT oN lInUx
Hey I am using LiNUX & the fonts look rALlE mUssud uP
 
Old 01-05-2003, 10:40 AM   #9
viciousfish
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sarge, Gentoo
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
TrueType fonts are special because they look exactly the same on the screen as they print out on paper. It was developed by Apple, ages ago, and licensed to Microsoft.

The real problem people used to have with linux fonts was two-fold:

1. True Type wasn't supported. This meant that there were often subtle differences between screen-fonts and printer-fonts, which annoyed graphics buffs. But now, True Type seems to work fine out of the box with most major distros.

2. The fonts weren't as well designed as Microsoft and Apple Fonts. Little dots and tics and burrs appeared where they shouldn't. Round edges had lumps on them. It takes alot of time an effort to design a font which scales well without looking bad.

So people wanted to use their nice windows fonts under linux. But TrueType wasn't supported, so an almighty fuss was kicked up, and a project to make True Type work (called FreeType) was started. Now some distros have special utilities specifically for extracting fonts from Windows and using them.

Of course nowadays both KDE and GNOME antialiase their fonts. This gets rid of the dots, ticks and burrs without needing a new font.
 
Old 01-14-2003, 11:10 PM   #10
linowes
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: New Hampshire
Distribution: RH8.0
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: 15
What about fonts in OpenOffice? I get Word doc's with TT fonts referenced (in styles etc) that don't show up. Sometimes the text is there but invisible until I manually change the font or add a OO specific font to the style.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why all the fuss about Mandrake? Dirty_Ink Mandriva 5 06-21-2004 08:11 AM
XFree86 distributed under a new license; distro's making a fuss: why?? qanopus General 24 03-11-2004 02:24 PM
an 368, still worth the fuss?? qanopus Linux - General 2 09-29-2003 06:07 AM
Why all the fuss about Kernels? Fredstickman Slackware 12 05-21-2003 09:13 AM
Any way to convert ttf fonts to linux console fonts? Glockage Linux - Software 7 12-30-2002 06:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration