GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Which statement best reflects your personal technology useage philosophy?
I am a Free Software zealot, it must all be free or nothing.
3
8.82%
I prefer Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) and use it by default.
18
52.94%
I use mostly FOSS but still rely on other OSs to get things done.
5
14.71%
50/50
5
14.71%
I use proprietary software, but use FOSS for some things.
Distribution: Originally Suse 9.1 Professional, currently Knoppix 3.7, migrating to Slackware
Posts: 75
Rep:
I like to class myself as a FOSS zealot. I have never let anything M$ touch my computer, and hopefully it never will (Grrr!) . However I still have to use proprietary stuff sometimes (eg. at school), and when I do, I generally find it puts me in a very bad mood very quickly!
I just wish the h4rdw4r3 m4k3rz would hurry up and realise that Linux is the way forwards and make drivers and stuff for us poor sorry downtrodden rebels. Then there'd be no reason to not use FOSS!
I use both so I chose 50/50. I see the need for both in the world and don't see any reason they can't coexist.
From a phylosophical viewpoint, the last answer "WE ARE BORG" could apply to OSS as well as it could proprietary. I'm not much of a trekkie, but it is my understanding that the Borg would take a human and put him to use in the best way he would serve the "hive" or whatever they're called. I think they would treat software much the same way, in other words they would use the most powerful, efficient, stable software for the task. So it does stand to reason that the Borg would in fact use Linux.
Last edited by Furlinastis; 03-01-2006 at 11:33 AM.
I agree with phil.d.g. While I prefer to use FOSS, I have no problem with the distribution or the using of proprietary software. It is the business practices of the companies which distribute that software that I may have objections to. Windows is a pretty good product; Microsoft has a lot to learn about business ethics.
However, I try to apply this thinking across the board with my assets, not just with software. If a person disagrees with the ethics of a particular company, one should not buy their products.
Im 50/50 for teh same reason as the guys above. I prefer Linux/Unix, but I can respect Windows. I've never gone on a unwarranted "Windows sucks" rant, and like wise for linux. For me its all about preference. FOSS is all good, but honestly, somethings just don't work as well as their proprietary counterparts.
Now eithics are another story...but you gotta use what makes you happy.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.