GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: What solution is best for the Drug issues in the US
and who would get sued when something goes wrong? canada isnt accountable in us court to my knowledge.
This is another serious problem with America...people are too big into suing when things don't go their way.
With proper R&D, a responsible drug company would thoroughly test a product and make the public aware of the risks. If this is done, I see most problems as being the result of poor judgement on the part of the consumer.
If it happens to be a bad batch, I doubt a country such as Canada (which is basically a subsidiary of the USA, economically) would be likely to claim they are not responsible. Just look what a single sick cow did for them.
Originally posted by mikshaw It's my belief that drug companies in the US have messed up priorities. Necessary prescription drugs, those meant for diseases and other serious afflictions, should be developed by non-commercial organizations which put every dollar into research and development (and reasonable salaries of course) rather than advertisements and lobbies. If a drug company wants to be commercial, they should stick to non-essential medications such as those for "natural male enhancement", over-the-counter drugs, and supplements.
Also, importing medication from other countries should be legal. Does anyone really believe that US drug companies are any more trustworthy than those in Canada?
First off major diseases are 90% of the time researched by the CDC. Second of all if the government ran everything we would have Nasa version of drug companies just great. The companies themselves are doing fine. Do you know how much money is finneled into R&D? They don't exactly skimp out on anythign in that field.
Originally posted by mikshaw This is another serious problem with America...people are too big into suing when things don't go their way.
With proper R&D, a responsible drug company would thoroughly test a product and make the public aware of the risks. If this is done, I see most problems as being the result of poor judgement on the part of the consumer.
If it happens to be a bad batch, I doubt a country such as Canada (which is basically a subsidiary of the USA, economically) would be likely to claim they are not responsible. Just look what a single sick cow did for them.
you just made the case against importing drugs. blaming the ignoarant consumer isnt really a viable option. lawsuits are a problem, we have bush who hasnt done anything to discourage frivolous suits, clinton didnt for 8 years, and now we have a choice between bush and kerry/edwards, 1 of which made his fortune by doing the thing you desribe and tax evasion. not exactly win win. id like to see if kerry is elected, if they do what edwards proposes and enact a penalty for losing. (this is highly unlikely and probably would be ruled unconstitutional)
Well most politicans are lawyers so its highly unlikely that we shall see anything be pushed for limiting lawsutis anytime soon......unless the entire populace sues the government for ignoring the people's wll :-p
if you watched the debate, got some insight into this tonight, affirming clinton and bush both believed the drugs would have to be safe to be imported and that it wouldnt help costs that much....
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.