GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
brianL, you just posted this to get my attention, right?
Problems relating to computational power aside, the main problem with this is that "you" (as in the biological "you") would still die, even if your silicon-based "copy" lived on, because "you" are still bound to your biological body (unless you buy into dualist "soul" bullsh*t ). Your "ego" wouldn't be "transferred" to the machine; it would just create a "second ego".
Put more simply, it would be more like having an immortal brother/sister, rather than becoming immortal oneself.
Last edited by MrCode; 12-06-2011 at 03:34 PM.
Reason: spelling
brianL, you just posted this to get my attention, right?
Mmm, now you come to mention it...
But would it be able to tell that it wasn't the "real" me? Would it think: "I'm Brian...but I feel strange these days."?
would it be able to tell that it wasn't the "real" me? Would it think: "I'm Brian...but I feel strange these days."?
From its perspective, no, it probably wouldn't be able to tell that it's not the "real" you, but that doesn't mean it's not a separate "entity".
Think of it like having two computers of the exact same hardware configuration, running the exact same OS and programs, executing the exact same instructions clock cycle for clock cycle. From each machine's "perspective", they are the same, but that doesn't mean they aren't physically separate entities.
I agree it's a separate entity, but it's got all my memories, such as all the experiences that have gone into forming my personality. The only thing it hasn't got is the body that had those experiences, and that will probably drive it crazy (crazier than the biological original).
Problems relating to computational power aside, the main problem with this is that "you" (as in the biological "you") would still die, even if your silicon-based "copy" lived on, because "you" are still bound to your biological body (unless you buy into dualist "soul" bullsh*t ). Your "ego" wouldn't be "transferred" to the machine; it would just create a "second ego".
That's not that easy. If a person does not have immaterial component, then this copy will also be you. Another you.
It comes down to the old "what is human?" question, which does not have definite answer.
brianL, you just posted this to get my attention, right?
Problems relating to computational power aside, the main problem with this is that "you" (as in the biological "you") would still die, even if your silicon-based "copy" lived on, because "you" are still bound to your biological body (unless you buy into dualist "soul" bullsh*t ). Your "ego" wouldn't be "transferred" to the machine; it would just create a "second ego".
Put more simply, it would be more like having an immortal brother/sister, rather than becoming immortal oneself.
Yes, that's all true. Now, "immortal" is a relative term. I mean, you're immortal, unless I decide to take a sledgehammer to the HDD your "immortal" copy is being stored on ...
i'm reading Ray Kurzweil's "The Singularity is Near" .....totally awesome and realistic stuff !!
btw , mind uploading is just one option of many portrayed by Ray and Co , other options such as bio-engineering and nanobots infused into the body are even "easier" to achieve and philosophically more intuitive !
I agree it's a separate entity, but it's got all my memories, such as all the experiences that have gone into forming my personality. The only thing it hasn't got is the body that had those experiences, and that will probably drive it crazy (crazier than the biological original).
You might be right about that. It wouldn't even have eyes to see. Imagine just your mind existing without any body. I'm not sure what would happen, but it could go mad, take over all computer systems, and destroy the world.
Would the uploaded brain be able to dream or imagine ? Or maybe it just will be a clone of the logic part of the brain, and will have similar reasoning as the original (cognitive and neural processes)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.