GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
@Jan K. I don't find your first link to be particularly relevant. The sample rate the team used for their analysis was extracted on a very short timeline before and after Musk's acquisition of Twitter and extended only through 2022 before measures such as 'blue check' verification and others could effectively reduce the load of 'bots' regurgitating trash across the platform.
"Using this methodology, the team extracted timelines of a sample of users who posted hateful tweets one month before and after Musk's purchase and measured their daily rates of hate speech during the same time period. ...Then, they measured the overall volume of hateful tweets throughout 2022."
only through 2022 before measures such as 'blue check' verification
I'm not a Twitter user, but I thought the blue check thing was a feature that long predated Musk's acquisition? And the only recent change was that is used to be about verifying identity and now it verifies payment?
I should have been more precise. There have been at least 3 different iterations of the 'blue check' process: In the first, Twitter themselves supposedly took steps to verify and distinguish genuine notable account holders, such as celebrities and organizations, from impostors or parodies.
In 2016 Twitter began accepting requests for verification, but it was discontinued the same year.
Three years later Twitter tried again: "This time offering notability criteria for the account categories of government, companies, brands, and organizations, news organizations and journalists, entertainment, sports and activists, organizers, and other influential individuals."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_verification
After Musk's purchase Twitter introduced paid verification/paid subscription to everyone with a phone #, address and email. 'Bots' probably haven't been eliminated but, IMO, certainly curtailed.
The liberal media hates him, other small minded people are jealous of his success. If I were him I'd probably pull the plug on Twitter and use the rest of my quarter of a Trillion dollars to help the human race become multi-planetary.
"PROFILE
Elon Musk
CEO, Tesla $250.4B
Real Time Net Worth
as of 7/16/23 #1 in the world today" https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-...h=581d9fea7999
The liberal media hates him, other small minded people are jealous of his success.
Who buys Tesla cars?
Jealousy is one thing... Extreme distaste for ego fuelled decision making is something else entirely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjolnir
If I were him I'd probably pull the plug on Twitter and use the rest of my quarter of a Trillion dollars to help the human race become multi-planetary.
I'd respect that... but you and I both know that it's never going to happen.
Also, how much of Elon's $240bn is tied up in Tesla stock? The company's latest balance sheet shows that the shares have a book value of less than $14 per share. If Elon were to suddenly liquidate all of his stock, the impact on the share price would be disastrous. He is somewhat stuck.
"Despite growing sales at many automakers, Tesla continues to dominate the American EV sector.
The all-electric brand saw its sales rise by 30 percent in the first six months of 2023, as compared to a year earlier. That meant that it sold 336,892 vehicles," https://www.carscoops.com/2023/07/te...ts-all-others/
...Also, how much of Elon's $240bn is tied up in Tesla stock? ...
I think I've read that he owns 15% of Tesla?
Musk is thought to own about 44% of SpaceX.
"The valuation of Elon Musk’s SpaceX hit near $150 billion following a share sale by existing investors announced this week, CNBC has learned.
SpaceX has an agreement with new and existing investors to sell up to $750 million in stock from insiders at $81 a share, according to a copy of the purchase offer sent by CFO Bret Johnsen on Thursday, which CNBC obtained.
The new share price represents an increase of about 5% from its previous secondary sale at $77 each, at a valuation of about $140 billion. SpaceX did not respond to a CNBC request for comment on the purchase offer." https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/13/elon...valuation.html
15% of $891bn is ~$133bn, so at least 56% of Elon's wealth is tied up in Tesla stock. Note that the 15% figure you see everywhere seems to exclude stock options that he also holds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjolnir
Musk is thought to own about 44% of SpaceX.
The thing to remember about SpaceX is that it is not a "business" in the conventional sense of the word. It's essentially a fund which is being used for research.
It doesn't generate any revenue per se... It receives grants from donors and sponsors for the work it does.
As such, the conventional rules of business cannot be applied to it.
The thing to remember about SpaceX is that it is not a "business" in the conventional sense of the word. It's essentially a fund which is being used for research.
It doesn't generate any revenue per se... It receives grants from donors and sponsors for the work it does.
As such, the conventional rules of business cannot be applied to it.
Agreed, but Starlink (subsidiary of SpaceX) appears to be very close to being spun-off to an IPO: "If Starlink goes public, it could be one of the largest IPOs in recent years." https://observer.com/2023/02/spacex-...ofit-ipo-plan/
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.