GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's worse, IMO. At least electric car subsidies are open to other companies.
It's not just the US government subsidising his product. There is a big world outside the US, you know. In fact, >96% of the world's population doesn't live there.
That's a huge market to have handed to you by governments everywhere. Yes, these things are open to other companies too, but it doesn't take any naus to grow a business in those circumstances.
How did this thread get on to the merits (or lack thereof) of electric transport. Last time everyone was slagging off Musk. Let's face it, he boughttwitter for $$44 billion, it's worth about a third of that now. Of that loans have to be given back in full, regardless of the drop in value. If he suckered some folks into buying shares, they've lost big time.
Musk has skill in getting money behind him, vision & imagination. And he can sell. SpaceX is arguably the best space effort in the world. Tesla is one of the world's great electric car ranges. He traded for many years at a loss, and still money kept flowing in. Not many have those personal qualities.
It's only when Musk gets on twitter, and much worse, after he bought it, that you can see through him. He's a prejudiced 'a**hole' as I believe the American expression is. We have a saying here about the lift (elevator) not going to the top story when we imply a mental deficiency. Musk seems to have the opposite problem. The lift doesn't go to the ground floor, where twitter tests him. But it goes way beyond the top story. That irritates folks who want to get out there.
Musk may relocate. He has a nice place in Dublin, Holland, England, etc. In fact if he's that hard up, he may even de-locate, and dispense with offices altogether. He is unpredictable. I won't say he's mad, but if he somehow ended up in a psych ward, would you let him out?
Twitter Write
@TwitterWrite
"Two new features for writers: you can now post up to 25,000 characters and add up to 4 inline images. Subscribe to access these new features: ..." https://twitter.com/TwitterWrite/sta...21120495685635
Odd; works here. Occasionally rate limiting kicks in, but IIRC that gives a different message. (Also, there are other Nitter instances which can be used when that happens.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.