Too Little, Too Late? - NY Times Finally Pulls Out the All the Stops on Climate Change
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Human Caused Climate Change is Real?
Too Little, Too Late? - NY Times Finally Pulls Out the All the Stops on Climate Change
Well, Gents it's High Stakes Poker time as in "Read "em and Weep". This is superb journalism but what I'd like to know is where was it 30 years ago?... or is it just easier to highlight big stories in the Digital Age?
What difference would it have made? The NY Times has been calling for the elimination of the Electoral College since 1936. Svante Arrhenius pointed out the warming effects of CO2 in 1894 (he thought it would be to the good, increase agricultural production). I remember explaining it to a girlfriend's family back then. I remember a distinguished Yale economist who argued that it would cost less to fix the damages than to prevent them.
Last edited by RandomTroll; 08-02-2018 at 02:26 PM.
Well, red neck logic is in charge, by popular demand, so you can throw facts into the septic tank. I already live in a hot zone.
I should be dead when water hit's 20 bucks a gallon. Glad my planet polluting central a/c is humming away nicely. It will be replaced when it breaks, because in the desert. It is a needed appliance. That or dig a big man cave hole. Because when you get down to it. In the end. It is still, all about me.
Adobe and Hay houses may just be the ticket for surviving some of this on a low budget. But no body is pushing this via main stream . Lumber and brick is still king.
My great grand kids have a tough row to hoe. Seeing that Jimmy Carter was considered a idiot. He installed Solar Thermal Panels on the White House roof and was considered a laughing stock for being a caring human being. Red Neck logic again.
Nice article. Maybe should be shot into space .
Edit: Citation:
Code:
$ pinxi -W pecos,tx
Weather:
Temperature: 37 C (98 F) Conditions: Clear
Current Time: Thu 02 Aug 2018 07:23:04 PM CDT
It was my intention to "avoid the fray" and be impartial in this thread but I just have to comment that as always I enjoy your comments and redneck logic, rokytnji, and I especially appreciate and applaud your blog entry regarding the still. Cool stuff and rather important hack. Kudos.
.... and Anthony Watts? You mean "I'm not an expert but I played one on TV" Anthony Watts?
Svante Arrhenius pointed out the warming effects of CO2 in 1894 (he thought it would be to the good, increase agricultural production). I remember explaining it to a girlfriend's family back then.
strange how the "debunking" always seems to concentrate on one or two aspects only, often involving colourful imagery.
contrary to popular news coverage, global warming has all sorts of complex effects (not necessarily resulting in warmer weather, as the name might imply), is clearly measurable, and has long been considered a scientfic fact.
of course, in a world where darwinism is being "debunked" as a non-fact... - well, i just learned that fact & theory are not opposed terms...
Realistically there never was anything we could have done about global warming. Nothing could be done back in the 1980's because there was no way the human race was going to inflict a drastic and permanent cut on its standard of living unless there was overwhelming proof that our survival depended on it. And back then, there was no real evidence of any such thing. Now the evidence is stacking up and eventually it will amount to proof, but nothing really effective can be done because it is already much too late.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
You should have added another option to your poll enorbet. Like "Other" or "Climate Change is real but not human/man-made."
I'm sorry, but the climate has been changing since the dawn of time - so it can't be "man-made". It's a natural fundamental process that would have happened regardless of whether we graced the poor (and no doubt sorry) Earth or not.
We have accelerated a fundamental process and therefore, we have sped up that same process to be seeing what we are with wild weather, more destructive storms, hotter (and colder) temperatures, etc.
Last edited by jsbjsb001; 08-03-2018 at 08:54 AM.
Reason: typo
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,491
Rep:
Sweltering in 80+F here, when, in my youth, the high temps used to be mid 60F that used to get me 'melting'.
Yes, most of it is man made, the excessive use of carbon fuels has caused a lot of it, & that has been proven - we should have stayed pedalling our bikes!
I'd like to know just what qualifications the 3 skeptics have! For the record, I did do a bit of climatology at Cambridge.
Of course, when the US Bible Belt turns into a dust-bowl ravaged by ever-more powerful tornadoes, at least the rest of us will be able to say "we told you so!" to the trumpkin!
@jsbjsb: it's true that there have been many episodes of global warming (and global cooling!) before we came on the scene. The biggest such episode was at the end of the Permian era. It was apparently caused by massive supervolcano eruptions in Siberia, and it caused the biggest ever mass extinction event. The extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous was a mere blip by comparison. Do we really want to go there again?
As an aside, I wonder what contribution to global warming the cryptocurrency craze is making?
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
The earth warms, the earth cools, the poles flip, the north and south poles become the equator, the equator becomes the north and south poles. Its called cycles, Natural Laws etc... it has occurred long before man took his/her first step, it will continue long after he/she takes their last step.
One natural/universal law is that the only constant in life, the only thing that remains unchanging is change itself. Perhaps, its time to add an * to this law that states, mankind's tendency to profit from that change is a new evolutionary trait.
These redundant threads are becoming quite comical, how many different ways do you need to rehash the same concept/idea?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.