GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It is a project that has been in the works for maybe 2 decades.
I rather doubt anyone on a Linux forum would consider it to be the best of both worlds. It has a place for some windows users maybe. Wish it had more developers working on it.
It is lightweight only because it is so limited. By version number I'm not sure they are at version 1 yet.
You should install it and use it on some older hardware you have or on a free virtual machine software on modern computer.
It is a project that has been in the works for maybe 2 decades.
I rather doubt anyone on a Linux forum would consider it to be the best of both worlds. It has a place for some windows users maybe. Wish it had more developers working on it.
It is lightweight only because it is so limited. By version number I'm not sure they are at version 1 yet.
You should install it and use it on some older hardware you have or on a free virtual machine software on modern computer.
I looked at it about 8-10 years ago, maybe even longer. Nothing but frustration just getting it to boot - but that was on real hardware; might be worth a look as a virtualised guest as suggested. I keep an eye on other OS development projects, but have long lost interest in this.
I seen somewhere they are updating the compiler and maybe adding 64bit. A lot of people bash ReactOS but I think it helps wine quite a bit in the long run. personally I think Windows design/layout is disgusting so naturally that carries to clones and emulators. That said I'd much rather run something in wine/ReactOS than boot Windows.
You should install it and use it on some older hardware you have or on a free virtual machine software on modern computer.
VM — yes, real hardware — no. They've just recently managed to get the e1000 driver working:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReactOS 0.4.12 released, September 23, 2019
Intel e1000 NIC driver
While ReactOS’ traditional usage in virtual machines generally shields it from rapid and oft massive changes in hardware configurations, even the systems emulated by virtual machines have undergone some evolution over the years. Case in point, VirtualBox and VMware have been shifting their default emulated network interface card to be based off of the Intel e1000 NIC in order to present their guests with a gigabit capable interface.
Thanks to work done by Mark Jansen and Victor Perevertkin, ReactOS now possesses a driver that supports this NIC out of the box instead of requiring end-users to manually find and install a driver, a finicky process if one does not have a working network connection in the first place. Furthermore, the new driver should also be compatible with e1000 NICs in real hardware, though of course more real-world testing will be necessary to fully validate that assertion. Interested testers are of course encouraged to try and see just how much ReactOS can get out of the e1000.
The only reason I would ever look at ReactOS would be gaming but as others have said, the project is 20 years old and not even close to being ready to do much of anything. Gaming on Linux is perfect for me so I have no motivation to try it. Cool project idea though.
I can't imagine the nightmare it is to symlink code to registries to make things windows comaptible and avoid getting sued by redmond at the same time.
No wonder it is still in beta. In a ever changing digital world. Hard to keep up/ketchup.
Edit: especially with the large debian, ubuntu,redmond, world, support to see them succeed. oh yeah. They don't have that either.
I recently tried it in VirtualBox. It seems to work well. Lightweight. I am not sure how it will work on a real desktop. Will it easily accept usb devices and printers? Will it run all applications? I was searching for these answers and reached this thread.
Where I work, there are old equipment where the only way of administrate those units are by using an old computer - because the software cannot run anything newer than windows XP. Had a go trying use ReactOS a little over a year ago, but had no luck installing the special software.
I see forward that day might come, so I can use something other than a VM (that also have problems communication using physical serial ports interfaces)
There are other uses than just gaming.
Where I work, there are old equipment where the only way of administrate those units are by using an old computer - because the software cannot run anything newer than windows XP. Had a go trying use ReactOS a little over a year ago, but had no luck installing the special software.
I see forward that day might come, so I can use something other than a VM (that also have problems communication using physical serial ports interfaces)
For this purpose, one could try some the old operating systems available at:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.