LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-20-2023, 07:31 AM   #1
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
The mysterious lax31s19-in-x0a.1e100.net and www2.net.net


I ran tcpdump overnight. Nothing ran that connected to the Internet other than a single time check. In the morning I found 499 accesses by lax31s19-in-x0a.1e100.net (which resolves to 2607:f8b0:4007:818::200a by ping). 'whois' on this found nothing. A DDG search attributes it to Google. When I try to http-connect it gets redirected to www2.net.net, which won't let me browse because it detects an ad blocker, which I don't have, in both seamonkey and Firefox. Knows anyone about this?
 
Old 10-20-2023, 07:27 PM   #2
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,086
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087
https://www.techjunkie.com/the-mysterious-1e100-net/
 
Old 10-21-2023, 09:21 AM   #3
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Thanks. Firefox wasn't running. I wasn't browsing anything, was in bed. I don't browse YouTube. A whois on 1e100.net refers to markmonitor.com, which shows no obvious connection to Google. It uses Google's name servers, but I think lots of people do.
 
Old 10-21-2023, 08:02 PM   #4
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,086
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087
It could just be a random port scan. Google has web crawlers working 24-7 to feed its search engine.

Do you have incoming connections blocked in you firewall?
 
Old 10-22-2023, 07:44 PM   #5
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Do you have incoming connections blocked in you firewall?
I lack a firewall. My router requires specific IP addresses. As near as I can tell Slackware has none. What do you recommend?
 
Old 10-22-2023, 08:30 PM   #6
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,086
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087
Well, Slackware does come with iptables, which is a firewall capability built into the kernel, but it is not configured out of the box.

As easy-to-use frontends for configuring it, I recommend ufw or gufw (gui-ufw). You can find both of them at slackbuilds.org.

I also would recommend closing incoming ports in your router unless you have a positive need for them.

Last edited by frankbell; 10-22-2023 at 08:41 PM.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 10:45 PM   #7
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
Slackware does come with iptables
I'm using it now, but it requires specific addresses, not ranges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
I also would recommend closing incoming ports in your router unless you have a positive need for them.
If that's possible I'll have to figure out how to do it. Many of these queries are zero-length queries to the https port. Since I'm not running a webserver they just get rejected. Most of the others are ICMP - I have to leave that on right? sendmail is listening, but I don't think I serve any other port. None of the queries are on 25.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 11:10 PM   #8
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,086
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087Reputation: 6087
There should be some way to log into your router and configure it. Check your router documentation.

As an aside, I just got a system "upgrade" from my ISP. As part of their "upgrade" they replaced my router with one of theirs (it has to do with the fact that they are also my cable provider, and their router is more compatible with their cable service, as now TV shows that I've "saved" for future viewing are now in their "cloud" and no longer on my cable box). I must say, their new router is much faster than my old one and the saved shows are working fine, but I still haven't figured out how to log into the router. But I will.

As regards iptables, take a serious look a ufw/gufw. They give you the capability of blocking incoming ports with a couple of commands.

Good luck.

Last edited by frankbell; 10-22-2023 at 11:12 PM.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 01:07 AM   #9
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
There should be some way to log into your router and configure it. Check your router documentation.
I log into it daily. The only blocking in the firewall is a single IP at a time.
 
Old 10-23-2023, 11:33 PM   #10
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,908

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 267Reputation: 267Reputation: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
take a serious look a ufw/gufw.
Do you use it? I had to supply a slew of other stuff, 2 of which wouldn't build. Even if it does block a whole domain with millions of entries in iptables, I don't know I'd like that.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why www2 ? future_computer General 2 12-09-2014 08:57 AM
LXer: Mysterious campaign appears to be latest salvo in net neutrality battle LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-18-2014 06:11 PM
File '/repodata/repomd.xml' not found on medium 'http://www2.ati.com/suse/11.4' shumbamajachani Linux - Software 2 01-31-2013 04:31 PM
my linux box chit-chatting too much to 1e100.net (Google) tix Linux - Security 2 05-24-2012 10:04 AM
Have www.mysite.com working, how to get www2.mysite.com set up? Alotau Linux - Server 4 04-15-2007 01:17 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration