The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Sorry but I had to post another video link, this is also spot on, whether you agree or not. I don't see any better alternative, but to keep Assad in power, considering what has been seen so far, it can only get even worse and more territory for this 'Frankenstein' that has been created.
Yet, the biggest concern for the US government and its allies is to oust Assad, even if he's fighting the real threat, which is ISIS. That's pretty nonsensical and absurd. Or maybe not, if one realizes that ISIS is just a tool, an army of mercenaries and fanatics that are being used to impose certain agenda in the region.
Yea I realize this is a lot from Russian sources, but only also to highlight IMO that Turkey is a liability for the EU and NATO, and again I also question Turkey's allegiance and possible support of IS discretely.
--edit
Lets not also forget that also Turkey was going after Kurdish forces which WERE fighting IS, instead of going IS as well, so Turkey was using this opportunity and took it as a green light to do what IT wants.
Well LQ members, I have just had both of my knees jerked; tiny goose bumps surface on my arms; and a trace of moisture in my eyes!! The last line is: " Hey, they wont have to fight that war. Thats what theyve got YOUR kids for. " The article is at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/11/...erry/isis-oil/
The first step to knowledge is to know that we are ignorant. -Richard Cecil
I lost relatives in WWII, I lost relatives in the Korean " police action ", I lost many friends in the Vietnam fiasco; are our political lunatics demanding WWW III?? https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/...tnam-war-show/
Last edited by cousinlucky; 12-02-2015 at 11:41 AM.
The first step to knowledge is to know that we are ignorant. -Richard Cecil
I lost relatives in WWII, I lost relatives in the Korean " police action ", I lost many friends in the Vietnam fiasco; are our political lunatics demanding WWW III?? https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/...tnam-war-show/
Possibly they are demanding it. After all they need a war to feed the military machine, and to make more money off the backs of dead suckers *cough* I mean heroes 'fighting for their country' or 'for freedom'.
This time obviously the stakes are very high. Now the Russian bear is constantly being poked, and she's waking up. Say what you want about the former Soviet country, but I doubt anyone would be dumb enough (well maybe for Turkey), to fully wake up the Bear.
Hell just look at history, others always labeled her as 'weak', 'backward', or 'a shell of itself'. I just look back at the most recent time in history, when Germany had a go at Russia. Sure at first it was a surprise for Russia, and a lot of people died, and continued to do so, BUT that just pushed Russia to churn out an amazing output of tanks and troops, and near the end obviously would have overrun all of Germany, sure again a LOT of casualties on the Soviet side, but that is NOT an issue for the Russians obviously. Its not about how many of their soldiers are killed at that point, they will overrun you no matter WHAT.
Now, it is obviously different, since Russia clearly is still nuclear capable and at this point they may just say 'fsck it, we're just gonna push the button and settle it that way.'
The big danger here, is again the rest of the world (mostly the West), in writing Russia off again, and I am repeating myself here but Turkey is dragging the rest of NATO down a VERY dangerous path. Turkey also thinks that because it is in NATO, it's back is covered by the rest of NATO and even the US, except that geographically also Russia is close by, and does the rest of NATO really WANT to race with Russia on who will reach Turkey first?
It seems that there is also discontent with Turkey from other NATO members and clearly this makes things even worse for Turkey, even though lets say there is a war between Turkey and Russia, other NATO member will NOT rush to Turkey's aid, for good reason actually. So this puts a greater spotlight where Turkey's allegiance truly lie.
If Turkey is willing to down a Russian jet that is bombing IS, will they go as far as downing French jets? So the other question is, is it really in Turkey's interest that IS is bombed? Hrmmmmm...
The Russians were bombing the ethnic Turkmen rebels (made Syrian by post-war Allied mapmakers), who are fighting against Assad AND fighting IS.
The place is a huge hairball of competing interests that resists translation into a suitable soundbite for the American news consumer.
The "goodies/baddies" metaphor doesn't really cut it.
The Russians were bombing the ethnic Turkmen rebels (made Syrian by post-war Allied mapmakers), who are fighting against Assad AND fighting IS.
The place is a huge hairball of competing interests that resists translation into a suitable soundbite for the American news consumer.
The "goodies/baddies" metaphor doesn't really cut it.
Ethnic Turkmen aside, you are right though this is all a complete mess. The problem is that the western media is still trying the good/bad argument, black-white, no grey area at all. At least one from the west sees it how it truly is, and that is Iran has a major role here and can actually HELP, but nah, Iran bad, blah blah blah according to Faux and co.
Again going back to Turkey v. Russia now. I wouldn't be surprised Russia wouldn't be increasing support now for the PKK. Worst case scenario now is there is an outright conflict between Russia and Turkey, or Russia could just say 'Ok, this part of northern Iraq, to part of Turkey and Iran is now officially Kurdish and we recognize it as a nation now.' Far fetched? Perhaps, but if the west has already done such arbitrarily moves as carving up the middle east during their era of empire, why not the Russians?
Its interesting how now the west also like to point fingers at Russia, stating 'oh , they are trying to bring back the Russian Empire', and I say, so what? What has the west been doing for so long anyways? This is the pot calling the kettle black. There is not much of an argument to make. Human rights? Again, who is anyone to point fingers at Russia or Syria, after all things the west has done too?
My neighbor thinks that the Russians will arm the Kurds to the teeth and let them cut up Turkey to their hearts content; while NATO hems and haws and does nothing!!
My neighbor thinks that the Russians will arm the Kurds to the teeth and let them cut up Turkey to their hearts content; while NATO hems and haws and does nothing!!
Rightfully so, and I don't see why they shouldnt only to counter Turkey and IMO the rest of NATO needs to be reviewing Turkey's membership.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.