GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i apologise if this has been discussed, i couldn't locate any posts.
--
i have a fresh slackware install, with kernel 2.4.5, and when i try to su, it spits out this error msg:
kud0ze@london:/etc$ su
Segmentation fault
kud0ze@london:/etc$
i've gotten a lot of hits on google searching for 'su and segmentation fault', but none regard my situation.
If su seg faults, that's scary... 'su' is part of the Sh-utils-2.0 package, which can be found under on the CD under package group A. Or, you can download it from sourceforge, and then install it with pkgtool.
Honestly, if that doesn't go way after re-installing sh-utils, something is really wonky. Like re-install wonky.
fantastic information. i appreciate the reply, even though in a brain-dead moment i posted in the wrong forum. this snmp crap going on is running me ragged!
i'll give it a go straight away.
unrelated -- how do you like fbsd? i'm d/l it right now for my other box.
Installing BSD is like installing Slackware... aside from that I'm beginning to get a Unix mailaise... all of the things about non-Slackware/Debian distros that piss me off are not there either... so aside from the funky names for eth devices and the fact that its an entirely different kernel, its still the same X-windows, same Kde, just loks a little different. FreeBSD, if you ever want to use it for something hardcore has a much faster tcp/ip stack and is pretty secure by default, although still a nudge or two back from OpenBSD, which could deflect a 7mm round.
every 2k server on the network was wide open, thanks to insight mgr and some shoddy confuration by whoever *was* doing it at the time... net engineering uses it mostly (openview), but apparently nobody knew how it got enabled on all the 2k desktops.
there is some pretty cool tools floating about now, though.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.