LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: Should Mozilla contribute to Chromium or should it continue to develop itself independently?
Mozilla should contribute to Chromium from now on 0 0%
Mozilla should continue to develop itself independently 22 100.00%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-03-2019, 04:55 AM   #1
l0f4r0
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2018
Location: Paris
Distribution: macOS, Slackware
Posts: 786

Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
Should Mozilla contribute to Chromium or should it continue to develop itself independently?


Following Kenneth Auchenberg tweet (Program manager at Microsoft but expression of its own thought here):
Quote:
Thought: It's time for @mozilla to get down from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Chromium, if they really *cared* about the web they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than 5%?
From my side, Mozilla should keep going its own way. Even if I'm not a big Firefox fan, I think it's really important to have separate projects with different people/philosophies/implementations to let people choose what they prefer considering their own criterias. It's healthier for the whole community.
It's not because Microsoft decided to use Chromium engine components for its Edge browser that everyone else should follow the lead. Independence and competition sounds sane to me, even in the open source world.
More, I'm not really reassured with this kind of thinking from Google (see LQ discussion)...

Last edited by l0f4r0; 02-03-2019 at 04:59 AM.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 05:10 AM   #2
jsbjsb001
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Earth? I would say I hope so but I'm not so sure about that... I could just be a figment of your imagination too.
Distribution: CentOS at the time of this writing, but some others over the years too...
Posts: 2,482

Rep: Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160Reputation: 1160
Quote:
Thought: It's time for @mozilla to get down from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Chromium, if they really *cared* about the web they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than 5%?
It's just sour grapes from Kenneth Auchenberg... :shrugs:

Quote:
Originally Posted by l0f4r0 View Post
It's not because Microsoft decided to use Chromium engine components for its Edge browser that everyone else should follow the lead. Independence and competition sounds sane to me, even in the open source world.
Not sure exactly what you're saying there, but first of all; I would take whatever M$ says with a VERY BIG pinch of salt for starters, second of all, they have been trying to kill off any competition ever since they started - so look at the motives behind it. They only care about open-source because they know they can't simply kill it off, or they would do just that. Don't be fooled.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 05:33 AM   #3
fido_dogstoyevsky
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 288
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 290Reputation: 290Reputation: 290
A statement directly or indirectly from microsoft that tries to affect my use of the internet? I can only reply by once again quoting Peter Cushing.

We REALLY don't need the browser equivalent of potato blight bringing the web to a standstill.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 06:59 AM   #4
JWJones
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,213

Rep: Reputation: 501Reputation: 501Reputation: 501Reputation: 501Reputation: 501Reputation: 501
Both MS and Google can take a flying f*ck at a rolling donut, for all I care. I will ALWAYS choose an independent Firefox (or FF-based) browser over anything Chromium-based. That dude is just another in a long line of idiots with an opinion at MS, just like that jackanape Steve Ballmer.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 08:35 AM   #5
fatmac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly OpenBSD, but still have AntiX on a couple of machines.
Posts: 2,768

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Must be able to block adverts, so, any browser must have that facility, as far as I'm concerned, (even if it means going back to text browsing).
 
Old 02-03-2019, 08:57 AM   #6
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" & Xfce.
Posts: 4,465
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783
Monopolies are never a good thing!
 
Old 02-03-2019, 09:22 PM   #7
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 14,535
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018
Sucking Mozilla into the Googleplex would be detrimental all-around.

Brainskip corrected. Thanks to cwizardone for catching my brainskip!

Last edited by frankbell; 02-03-2019 at 11:29 PM.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 10:02 PM   #8
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix, Devuan, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,163

Rep: Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993Reputation: 993
Competition helps everyone also acts as a type of check/balance for integrity/honesty. I would like to see more browsers to put pressure on Chrome/Chromium and Firefox, not less.
 
Old 02-03-2019, 10:32 PM   #9
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 14,535
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018Reputation: 4018
Just as an afterthought, although the Mozilla Foundation has made some missteps (who hasn't?), it has generally acted with integrity and on the side of user privacy.

The latter alone makes them incompatible with anything Google.
 
Old 02-04-2019, 01:07 AM   #10
Trihexagonal
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2017
Location: Land of 1000 Nights
Distribution: FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Solaris
Posts: 185

Rep: Reputation: 159Reputation: 159
It needs to get it's own shop in order and work on the problems that exist before anything else.
 
Old 02-04-2019, 02:56 AM   #11
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 10,763
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694Reputation: 2694
that was an easy choice.
no choice at all really.

now please show the poll results around to as many people as possible, esp. those responsible.
and the one quoted in post #1.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Monopolies are never a good thing!
word.
______________

Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky View Post
I can only reply by once again quoting Peter Cushing.
there's no quote, just some memes?
 
Old 02-04-2019, 02:57 AM   #12
Christopher Wylie
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2018
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Monopolies are never a good thing!
Never!
 
Old 02-04-2019, 06:21 AM   #13
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,215
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307Reputation: 1307
MS have a crap browser which is around 3 - 5% market share (and market share is all they care about), so they "do an Opera" and expect another independent browser project with a similar market share to follow them in their failure and idiocy (called a "commercial decision" no doubt). MS made a lot of glaring errors with Edge. In my opinion the arrogance of not making it available on Windows 7/8/8.1 was the biggest mistake and really hurt it's uptake. It meant that a lot of users were stuck with IE as an MS browser on those Windows releases, and started to look elsewhere for a modern browser. Once those users made the move to Windows 10, they already had a browser they were accustomed to - perhaps the browser they also used on Android devices - and Edge would have been a non starter for many.

google have cornered the web browser market, MS have been wiped out and the move to the chromium base is just an acknowledgement of this.

Mozilla/firefox and some of the smaller, independent (non blink/webkit) projects are all that's left. But in terms of modern, full featured browsers there is really only firefox left.

I have been using Iridium (a chromium fork) for probably more than 12 months, but it leaves a bad taste in the mouth. I will probably abandon ship and move back to firefox before long...

Last edited by cynwulf; 02-04-2019 at 06:23 AM.
 
Old 02-04-2019, 11:06 AM   #14
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" & Xfce.
Posts: 4,465
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783Reputation: 1783
I've been very pleased with Pale Moon and it seems to just get better.
As it is a fork off a older version of Firefox and if you (whomever) liked the older Firefox, you might like Pale Moon.

https://www.palemoon.org/

I use the most recent version of Firefox to stream video, but Pale Moon for everything else.

Last edited by cwizardone; 02-04-2019 at 11:13 AM.
 
Old 02-04-2019, 11:06 AM   #15
Myk267
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: California
Posts: 416
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Thought: It's time for @mozilla to get down from their philosophical ivory tower. The web is dominated by Chromium, if they really *cared* about the web they would be contributing instead of building a parallel universe that's used by less than 5%?
This is not even wrong, in so many ways it blows my mind a little.

First of all, I don't think Mozilla is in an ivory tower. They ship a browser, and have, since forever. They walk the walk.

Second, nobody has to accept Kenneth Auchenberg's junky false dichotomy of either "caring about the web" or not contributing to Chromium. It's not clear at all that Mozilla maintaining their own "parallel universe" of patches that probably don't get accepted into Chromium if they don't please Google is in their best interest if they do care about the web. 5% of users on Gecko might turn into less than 5% on Blink.

Third, later on in the thread, Kenneth Auchenberg believes that they will somehow wrestle control of the Chromium project from Google. That's a fine belief, but what if you're wrong? Hope you enjoy your 1% of Chromium fork, I guess?

There's also this:
Quote:
1) The modern web platform is incredible complex. Today it's an application runtime comparable to the Java or .net framework.
Bad example. There's a bunch of JVMs with different implementation goals and strategies.

Quote:
No it's collaboration on a common project for a common mission. The current approach is failing us. We are stretching our limited resources too thin for the web to win. We need to rethink this.
What evidence do we have that the current approach isn't working? It seems to be working so well that it's getting a little out of hand! It's too late to rethink a 'from first principles' approach, at this point.

Anyway. I've burned enough time on this. I'm not ideologically opposed to Firefox-on-Chromium, I'm just not convinced that's necessary. In the twitter thread, I think Asa Dotzler and Marion Daly make good points; I'd skip the rest.
 
  


Reply

Tags
chromium, development, mozilla, poll, software


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Chakra Linux: Its Own Beast, Its Own Beauty LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-18-2017 06:42 PM
LXer: Microsoft has created its own FreeBSD. Repeat. Microsoft has created its own FreeBSD LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-09-2016 12:42 PM
LXer: Microsoft has developed its own Linux. Repeat. Microsoft has developed its own Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-18-2015 05:51 PM
LXer: Mozilla picks one of its own to be its new CEO LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-29-2014 12:11 AM
LXer: OOXML Woes Continue as Norway Files Protest with ISO Relating to its Own Vote LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-01-2008 02:20 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration