LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: Which harddisk brand would you recommend?
Seagate 4 44.44%
WD 3 33.33%
Other 4 44.44%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-18-2017, 12:14 PM   #1
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Seagate versus Western Digital ?


Hello,

WD have amazing quality harddisks.
Seagate too.

Reading the following website, comparing those two brands.
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...le-hard-drives

What are you user experience of harddisk (WD vs Seagate)? Maybe some feedbacks from users may be of interests.

Thank you!
 
Old 07-18-2017, 12:36 PM   #2
rknichols
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Rocky Linux
Posts: 4,779

Rep: Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212
There should be a choice for "No preference". Both brands have had their share of horror stories and have people swearing never to buy that brand again. My own preference right now is for HGST, but that brand has been taken over by Western Digital, so whether its history of superior quality will continue is uncertain.
 
Old 07-18-2017, 01:31 PM   #3
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by rknichols View Post
There should be a choice for "No preference". Both brands have had their share of horror stories and have people swearing never to buy that brand again. My own preference right now is for HGST, but that brand has been taken over by Western Digital, so whether its history of superior quality will continue is uncertain.
Well WD was in the past slightly better than Seagate, but it might have changed.
 
Old 07-18-2017, 08:28 PM   #4
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,321
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141Reputation: 6141
I have had positive experiences with both.
 
Old 07-18-2017, 10:48 PM   #5
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
I've had two Seagate drives fail on my while still new.

WDs I've had great experiences with. My super-low-end WDs (Greens) lasted years, and my midrange (Black, Blue, Red) WDs have lasted until I decided to replace them.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 02:15 AM   #6
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
I've had two Seagate drives fail on my while still new.

WDs I've had great experiences with. My super-low-end WDs (Greens) lasted years, and my midrange (Black, Blue, Red) WDs have lasted until I decided to replace them.
What about the red? they are much more expensive.

SSD looks cool but too expensive.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 01:20 PM   #7
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeratul View Post
What about the red? they are much more expensive.
I'm still using this one that I bought in 2013:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...7/#post4982162

Last edited by dugan; 07-19-2017 at 01:26 PM.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 01:37 PM   #8
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
Erm, use both?
Components fail, always when you need them not to.
Or use either?
Again, hardware will fail.
edit: to explain I think that, known issues aside, I think talk of vendors is irrelevant and how to ensure data is backed up, accesible and safe is important and not much else.

Last edited by 273; 07-19-2017 at 01:39 PM.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 04:37 PM   #9
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Seems that Seagate is in favor so far regarding the poll. I wonder if really seagate is that good.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 04:40 PM   #10
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,005
Blog Entries: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
IMO, Samsung (if I can afford it), SanDisk otherwise. I'll go with a small cheap SSD before I go with a large slow spinning platters anymore. I have 1 drive that has platters, a 2 TB external drive that is used for backups and nothing else.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 07:24 PM   #11
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,980

Rep: Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624
Seagate and WD offer a limited Acronis for windows users so that is something.
 
Old 07-19-2017, 10:12 PM   #12
ReginaBob
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2017
Location: Regina,Saskatchewan,Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu 16.04
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
WD or Seagate?

I have had no trouble with either of these brands,whether as boot or data drives.These days I use SSDs exclusively for boot drives to speed up my antique hardware.For these I am using Sandisk and Kingston,both of which are trouble free so far.(about a year and a half).I guess the most impressive HDD I have is the first 2 TB hard drive I ever bought,when that size first became available.It is a WD black,and has been used as a data drive in 3 or 4 computers as I upgraded from a 10 yr old computer to a n 8 yr old,etc.Rather than copy music files to the boot drive,I just move the data drive to whatever computer I am using.I started doing it this way back in Windows 7,to avoid losing data when there were problems with Windows(crashes,unwanted updates that broke things,etc).Now it is just standard procedure for me.It also saves money on SSDs,since I dont need a very big boot drive.The only issue,a very small one,is deciding what power setting to use on the data drive.It presently powers up on bootup,and then powers down after 15 min.if not in use.I find I access the data drive less and less as I do more stuff on line.Netflix,email,etc.All that being said,whats the big deal,anyway?With Linux it is a trivial matter to install onto a new HDD.My advise is buy quality,and dont worry about it.
 
Old 07-20-2017, 04:24 AM   #13
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 915

Rep: Reputation: 313Reputation: 313Reputation: 313Reputation: 313
Never had an issue with WD.
 
Old 07-20-2017, 12:16 PM   #14
Xeratul
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: UNIX
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,657

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 255Reputation: 255Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe View Post
Never had an issue with WD.
Green, blue, which colors of hdd?
 
Old 07-20-2017, 12:20 PM   #15
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 915

Rep: Reputation: 313Reputation: 313Reputation: 313Reputation: 313
Mostly, blue. Including my latest portable WD HDD which is also (accidentally) blue.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Western Digital WD1002FBYS tmel173 Linux - Hardware 8 04-22-2015 05:21 AM
Western Digital RE4 Drives vs Western Digital AV Drives krazybob Linux - Hardware 3 12-08-2013 03:43 AM
Seagate barracuda vs western digital black 1TB samnjugu Linux - Hardware 6 01-26-2010 12:56 PM
Linux with Western Digital? bdoublegeez Linux - Newbie 6 10-03-2008 10:24 PM
Western digital drivers Darthbudge Linux - Newbie 6 11-26-2005 07:21 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration