LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2007, 08:33 PM   #1
Hitboxx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 1,562
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 68
Post Safari on Windows, so?


Dear All

Yes, Apple has released Safari on Windows currently public beta and Apple is touting it to be the best browser on the planet. eeks..

What are your thoughts?

My
According to their site, 12 reasons to love Safari

1) Blazing Performance- Excuse me but Safari gobbles up 70mb of RAM at startup while Firefox digs a measly 18mb (atleast on my PC), don't bother about IE (who does anyway).

2) Elegant User Interface- Oh really, you gotta be kidding me, its the most boring thing I've seen since Windows 95, again Apple says "Safari’s clean, sleek look lets you focus on the web instead of your browser". Sorry but I'm used to having icons in my browser, which actually increases my workflow, as I've been accustomed to icons of different sites.

3) Easy Bookmarks- Firefox provides it.

4) Pop-up Blocking- Again, Firefox.

5) Inline Find- Firefox again.

6) Tabbed Browsing- Yeah, you guessed it, Firefox.

7) Snapback- Dunno but this appears to be the only special thing in Safari, if Firefox provides it by some extension or something, I'm unaware, so please let me know guys.

8) Forms Autofill- Firefox.

9) Built-in RSS- Firefox.

10) Resizable Textfields- A strange feature, what's the purpose?

11) Private Browsing- If and when required, Firefox.

12) Security- Firefox does enough for me here, no thanks.

Call me a Firefox fanboy but that is how I feel. Pen your thoughts. And if Safari provides some other unknown features available please post them. Thanks

Edit: And on top of this all, can you really beat the power of the community(people), Extensions??

Last edited by Hitboxx; 06-12-2007 at 09:10 PM.
 
Old 06-12-2007, 08:40 PM   #2
St.Jimmy
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Boaz,Alabama
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 / Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit / Snow Leopard 10.6.4 64-Bit
Posts: 152

Rep: Reputation: 30
it uses the KHTML engine
 
Old 06-12-2007, 10:26 PM   #3
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31
the Inquirer version of this story, funny as always
 
Old 06-12-2007, 10:44 PM   #4
AceofSpades19
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079

Rep: Reputation: 58
whats the point of it, its basically an uglier, slower version of firefox
 
Old 06-13-2007, 12:12 AM   #5
colinstu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 15
I tried it... I'm sticking to my Firefox.

Same if I were on a mac, I'd download firefox and thunderbird in a heart beat (among other things).
 
Old 06-13-2007, 02:53 AM   #6
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 65
The only positive thing about this is that it will indeed make life a lot easier for web developers. In my former job, we had a lot of issues with clients using Safari. It was just impossible to get things right with that crappy browser and without a Mac to test it, things got difficult.

Now, the negative thing about it is that Apple borrowed a lot of things from Opensource community (much, much more than MS does). Heck, Safari is even based on the Konqueror's Engine. Yet, they release Safari for Windows only, instead of being at least kind and release it, at very least, to *BSD.

It is things like these (among many others) that makes me dislike Apple so much. Yet, so many defend it. Linux > MS >>> Apple

Last edited by Mega Man X; 06-13-2007 at 03:03 AM.
 
Old 06-13-2007, 07:19 AM   #7
Dox Systems - Brian
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 31
I like Safari on the Mac because it's so fast. Haven't tried the PC version yet, but if it's slower than Firefox, I'm definitely not using it there! I still use IE on my PC because Firefox is so painfully slow!
 
Old 06-13-2007, 07:26 AM   #8
vangelis
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Hellas
Distribution: Zenwalk 6.4
Posts: 337
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 30
Since I'm a fanboy of Konqueror (and please people try it!)

I would have to say that for me apple gets -1 more, since as St.Jimmy first said, it uses the KHTML engine which is what Konqueror is developed on and many many other open source projects use as well(like Amarok), at least give some credit!
 
Old 06-13-2007, 09:38 AM   #9
samael26
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: France, Provence
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 848

Rep: Reputation: 30
It's much faster than Firefox, to load and browse. People ought to try it on OSX and see the difference instead of just nagging about that browser.
Anyway, except for speed, Firefox is better, as the interface makes much more sense and the extensions are plenty.
 
Old 06-13-2007, 09:50 AM   #10
Dragineez
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Annapolis
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 41
Read And Comprehend

Quote:
Originally Posted by samael26
It's much faster than Firefox, to load and browse. People ought to try it on OSX and see the difference instead of just nagging about that browser.
I thought this thread was entitled "Safari on Windows". What does its speed under OSX have to do with the topic? If I'm not mistaken, wouldn't "trying it on OSX" require that I have a Mac? Maybe I'm wrong. When is Apple's release date for OSX on the PC?
 
Old 06-13-2007, 10:03 AM   #11
easuter
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Portugal
Distribution: Slackware64 13.0, Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 538

Rep: Reputation: 62
From what I can gather from people who have tested it on Windows XP is that its closer to pre-alpha software then beta software.... *very* unstable and extremely feature-lacking.
Apple should be sued for calling it the "Worlds best browser"
 
Old 06-13-2007, 10:55 AM   #12
dasy2k1
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 963

Rep: Reputation: 36
i havew used it on windows xp and found it fairly good,

its definatly faster than either firefox or IE7 at most things, (startup and page load)

however the one lack of feture that breaks it for me is a decent adblocker,
im so used to not seeing adds atall with firefox that it comes as a shock how many there are with safari (or ie7)

my ratings. out of 10

firefox 2, 10
firefox 1.5.x, 9
safari, 8
konqueror, 8
opera, 7
IE7 6
Mozilla 5
netscape 5
Ie6 4
 
Old 06-13-2007, 12:57 PM   #13
Dox Systems - Brian
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by vangelis
Since I'm a fanboy of Konqueror (and please people try it!)

I would have to say that for me apple gets -1 more, since as St.Jimmy first said, it uses the KHTML engine which is what Konqueror is developed on and many many other open source projects use as well(like Amarok), at least give some credit!
Konqueror was always my favorite back in my Linux days, but AFAIK, it's not available on any of the desktop platforms I use now (Windows, Mac, and Solaris) :-(
 
Old 06-13-2007, 02:37 PM   #14
easuter
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Portugal
Distribution: Slackware64 13.0, Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 538

Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Konqueror was always my favorite back in my Linux days, but AFAIK, it's not available on any of the desktop platforms I use now (Windows, Mac, and Solaris) :-(
Hopefully it will be available for Windows since KDE 4 is going to have a Windows port.
 
Old 06-13-2007, 02:44 PM   #15
phantom_cyph
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: The Tropics
Distribution: Slackware & Derivatives
Posts: 2,472
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by easuter
Hopefully it will be available for Windows since KDE 4 is going to have a Windows port.
Wait...what? KDE 4 will work on Windows? Thats almost scary, Windoze will even make it look bad.

As far as Safari, never used it, never intend to, Konqueror is too bloated, IE is way to bloated and soaks bandwidth, Firefox is just right.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Firefox, Safari back on browser attack LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-04-2007 12:01 AM
LXer: Browser Smackdown: Firefox vs. IE vs. Opera vs. Safari LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-07-2006 01:03 AM
LXer: Survey: Safari, Firefox gain ground against IE LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-06-2006 01:46 PM
Safari Style Sheet Problem atomicx Programming 2 05-03-2005 12:21 AM
Apple's Safari in RH9? tenraek Linux - Software 2 04-16-2003 05:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration