GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
There is a big difference between the standard RH9 and the Enterprise (ie, Advanced Server) versions. First is cost. Advanced Server, now called Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS, will set you back $1500 or more. It is intended for large (up to 8 CPU's) servers. They now offer Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES for smaller systems (1 to 2 CPU's) and costs between $350 and $600. And there is Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS, the workstation edition of the 'Enterprise' family.
The Enterprise line is not based on the latest and greatest kernel. They strive for stability, as this is what you want for a business. The release cycle is normally 18 months from version to version. What business wants to do a new version upgrade every 6 months? And if you want support for Oracle, etc, then you need an Enterprise version. Oracle won't talk to you if you are using a downloaded or store-bought version.
I'm not saying that the standard (personal) versions of RedHat will not do the trick. They can, but you must be willing to be your own support for your server and/or database if you do use it.
Distribution: Mint 17.2 ,OpenSuse, Kali and Pepermint OS 6
Posts: 276
Rep:
it is very stable as a server platform I just upgraded my webservers from 7.3 to 9 and it is running flawless I am working on a 2 year uptime at the moment
I just put Redhat 9 on a system to give it a try (was not that impressed with 8.0) and I am sticking with redhat 7.2 for my servers for now but I thought that for the desktop redhat has come a long way with 9.0, Quite a few things are looking much smoother (graphics, install, etc...) also I see that they have a little bit of a clone of add/remove programs in it, (rpm based) that should help the new guy out.
All in all I think the 9.0 is going to be a nice product, I only have the downloaded versions, I will have to beat it up some more before I try it on a server.
Well which version does linuxiso.org have up for download?? Im only going to have 1-2 cpu server so obviously the AS version is not exactly suitable for me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.