LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2019, 07:32 AM   #1
jr_bob_dobbs
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Distribution: Bedrock, Devuan, Slackware, Linux From Scratch, Void
Posts: 651
Blog Entries: 134

Rep: Reputation: 188Reputation: 188
Question on the BSD 2-clause license


Apologies in advance, because I could not with certainty determine which section this should be posted in.

A question has emerged on the BSD 2-clause license. The last paragraph of that license is
Code:
The views and conclusions contained in the software and documentation are 
those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing official 
policies, either expressed or implied, of the <project name> project.
What if the program being licensed is not part of a "project?" What if it's just: Bob wrote a program here it is enjoy and have a nice day? I assume removing the paragraph would make it no longer the BSD 2-clause license. So when there is no project, how does one word it? Or must one go to a different license?

Thank you.

Last edited by jr_bob_dobbs; 06-26-2019 at 07:35 AM.
 
Old 06-26-2019, 07:37 AM   #2
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
Just guessing because I have never had to deal with this: the project name would be the program Bob wrote. The license would pertain to that application. All applications are "projects" whether 1 person wrote it or 100 people wrote it.

My .02.
 
Old 06-26-2019, 05:00 PM   #3
ntubski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 3,780

Rep: Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081Reputation: 2081
You could do like NetBSD:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_li...SD_License%22)
Quote:
Other projects, such as NetBSD, use a similar 2-clause license, but without the additional disclaimer.
http://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html#default
 
Old 06-26-2019, 05:49 PM   #4
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367
Perhaps consider the ISC licence: https://www.isc.org/licenses/
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which is best licensed ftp server : Pureftp(Bsd license) vs vsftpd (Gpl license) jsaravana87 Linux - Server 1 10-03-2012 11:22 AM
GPL license, BSD license and... ? kikinovak Slackware 3 09-10-2012 12:53 PM
PC BSD, Open BSD, or Free BSD ? Alexvader *BSD 5 02-08-2010 12:40 AM
LXer: The Unlicense: A License for No License LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-12-2010 03:32 AM
Question: How to define an SQL HAVING clause in relational algebra? jdruin Linux - Software 1 11-08-2004 07:50 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration