GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
That thread was a response to an earlier thread. I'm under the impression that that earlier thread was also started by Anisha, but I'm not going to go looking for it to confirm.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
See a professional and get information from experts that will help you . Asking for information on a site like this from people you do not know from a bar of soap is a recipe for a thread to turn to mush, as has already started before I even got here with the typical conspracy theories and dragging up ancient history . Good to see the usual recidivist offenders are keeping up their typical modus operandi
I'll be serious for a moment. Calcium deficiency. Get some multivitamin and mineral tablets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
You shouldn't have said that, they'll rip you to shreds very soon. Those multivits are dangerous things, can kill a man real quick. You gave poor Anisha a death sentence. RIP Anisha...
I agree with TeXMeX here, Brian, you really shouldn't have said that. Now,
don't dare to mention the word "salt" here! Who knows, they might be monitoring
this thread and waiting for someone to talk about salt so that they can rip
him up all over again!
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
Why are you asking the LQ community a question better answered by health and fitness experts? If you actually trust your LQ friends the most, that's great, but posing the question here is still like asking experts on muscles about a Linux problem.
Not sure what people consider a "medical" advice!
I didn't ask any advice on injections and pills. Did I?
In the other thread linked by Dugan, all I asked was the doctor's "name".
Now if someone wants to talk about salts and medicines, that's not my fault.
Besides, this is what I actually asked here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anisha Kaul
Well, is it true that you'll be building more and more muscles, the more you do push-ups?
Is this sort of question going to kill me or anyone else?
LQ is surrounded by men, and men usually do push-ups, so I thought people might be
knowing something about it here.
Though I appreciate the concern, but I do think that there isn't any need for people
to start nitpicking.
I am NOT going to take anyone advice here "for granted" for sure. I do research always
before dealing with my body issues.
Saying it again:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anisha Kaul
Posting on LQ (/General), for me, is not always a way to get the perfect solution. Sharing experiences with known people, listening to them, joking around etc., is also a reason behind the threads in /General.
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 08-25-2012 at 08:20 AM.
I did read an article where women (I make a huge assumption that you are female) can increase bone density by running. These studies are never very good. The ladies that run may be health nuts and eat well, and get rest and also do exercise.
When I was a kid a guy named Jack La Lane would be on tv and do simple exercises. One of them was a deal with a chair. One would put their chest on the chair and lift either or both legs. I have found that and a similar exercise to be the best for my back. The next was a deal where you layed down on the floor on belly. Then lifted legs and arms and wiggled them in opposite motion for a 10 count. Then relax. Do that 4 or 5 time every few days and see if it helps your back.
As with all this, consult a doctor who can decide if you are healthy enough.
Both will increase your overall strength, and will have some effect of your muscle.....even if you do huge numbers of repetitions with very low weight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldy3105
Er, Any muscle, used repeatedly, will get bigger. Its kind of a biological thing. As long as you are eating enough calories including a reasonable amount of protein, you will get stronger and build muscle.
Did you decide this was true using "common sense" or confirm it with experiment?
Did you decide this was true using "common sense" or confirm it with experiment?
Er, no I read some books and did some exams on biology when I was younger. Plus I have since done a lot of weight trainging myself and have never found a muscle that wouldn't grow.
Never occured to me that someone might not know this really. Muscle tissue is muscle tissue. There are a few subdivisions of muscle types but they all respond to being exercised in the same way. i.e. exercise = muscle damage = healing and size increase.
Go look at some body building web sites. They may be strange obsessive people but you cannot deny that they know whereof they speak.
Er, no I read some books and did some exams on biology when I was younger. Plus I have since done a lot of weight trainging myself and have never found a muscle that wouldn't grow.
Never occured to me that someone might not know this really. Muscle tissue is muscle tissue. There are a few subdivisions of muscle types but they all respond to being exercised in the same way. i.e. exercise = muscle damage = healing and size increase.
I guess the question is more about the exercise than the muscle tissue. What do you think about the claim that more than 20 reps won't increase muscle size? I suppose the explanation would be that such low intensity exercise doesn't cause muscle damage?
I agree with TeXMeX here, Brian, you really shouldn't have said that.
Why on earth not?
Its a reasonable suggestion, even if (at least IMO and from what I've heard from medical sources) multivitamin and mineral tablets alone wont solve the problem, and low bone density isn't always conencted to a calcium deficiency.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntubski
Did you decide this was true using "common sense" or confirm it with experiment?
From personal experience.
One example is I'm an x-screenprinter. When I started I would do maybe 2000-3000 reps with very low weight loadings and pick up 10-15KG 100+ times a day. I put on muscle, and so did everybody elseI know who did the same job.
One example is I'm an x-screenprinter. When I started I would do maybe 2000-3000 reps with very low weight loadings and pick up 10-15KG 100+ times a day. I put on muscle, and so did everybody elseI know who did the same job.
AFAIK, you're a male. (I know you weren't replying to me.)
I will stand by what I originally said. Anisha (a chick) is not going to bulk out into a bodybuilder by doing pushups.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.