GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
yes, aa on beryl is much needed. (though dont get too harsh PartickMay... no need to insult. He might not have the hardware to use aa)
Sorry. I'll relax my language, and just make sure you all get me on this. I think irish_rover's desktop is good for the most part... but the jaggies ruin the whole thing for me.
you have to know how to see and love these sorts of things and a computer screen doesnt need that much fonts actually ... i feel that fonts problems have been solved long time ago ...
//i think the "later" fonts got something to do with advertisements ...
Sorry. I'll relax my language, and just make sure you all get me on this. I think irish_rover's desktop is good for the most part... but the jaggies ruin the whole thing for me.
Personal opionion/preference. You cant argue about stuff like that
Distribution: Arch Linux && OpenBSD 7.4 && Pop!_OS && Kali && Qubes-Os
Posts: 824
Rep:
Does anyone know if there is mp3 player that supports transparent skins ?
Xmms has limited support for transparent skins but those doesn't look too good.
rocket357, where did you get the fluxbox theme for that? I like the theme...don't really care for the background though. (just my opinion)
Then I don't really care to tell you what theme that is =P
Just kidding...it's called "Paper", and it's listed on my machine as being under Legacy Commonbox styles. Everything is stock on the theme except for the transparency (which I set in fluxbox manually). It's part of the commonbox-styles package in portage.
I guess I could've gotten upset at the concept that things I like aren't liked by others, and then in a fit of depression lashed out in an irrational manner...but hey, it's just a silly background hahaha.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.