GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It is not materialism that is the chief curse of the world, as pastors teach, but idealism. Men get into trouble by taking their visions and hallucinations too seriously.
« O vous, les boutefeux, ô vous les bons apôtres
Mourez donc les premiers, nous vous cédons le pas
Mais de grâce, morbleu! laissez vivre les autres! »
“Oh you the shot firers, oh you the good apostles
Die then as the first, we let you take precedence
But, have mercy, for crying out loud! Let live the others!”
Either you lack friends or you are in the wrong place.
But anyway, “When truth is on your side, you don't need support...”. No. Skip that one. It is worse than my own.
Better: „Nothing is harder and asks for more (strength of) character, than to find youself in open contradiction with your time and to say aloud: NO !” (Kurti)
and: „... and also, here, the person who indicates the foulness is considered much more dangerous than the person who causes foulness.“ (Kurti)
Last edited by Michael Uplawski; 07-24-2019 at 04:14 AM.
Reason: htere was a wrong ht somehwere.
"You think man can destroy the planet? What intoxicating vanity! Let me tell you something about our planet: Earth is four and a half billion years old. There has been life on it for nearly that long: three-point-eight billion years. Bacteria first, later the first multi-cellular life, then the first complex creatures in the sea and on the land. Then finally the great sweeping ages of animals: the amphibians, the dinosaurs, at last the mammals. Each one enduring millions on millions of years. Great dynasties of creatures rising, flourishing, dying away... all this against a background of continuous and violent upheaval: mountain ranges thrust up, eroded away. Cometary impacts. Volcanic eruptions. Oceans rising and falling. Whole continents moving in an endless, constant, violent change, colliding, buckling to make mountains over millions of years. Earth has survived everything in its time. And it will certainly survive us."
This is unfortunate phrasing. Of course man cannot destroy the planet and people should be more precise when talking about the very palpable danger that humanity could destroy its habitat.
In France « la planète » replaces everything concerned with ecology, thus becomes SEP. “Somebody“ should maybe do something about .., well. It, I guess. Whatever.
“Now therefore, that my mind is free from all cares, and that I have obtained for myself assured leisure in peaceful solitude, I shall apply myself seriously and freely to the general destruction of all my former opinions.”
(Rene Descartes)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.