GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The Sunday New York Times had a long and thoughtful article about how "Silicon Valley Is Not Your Friend."
The author's primary argument is that, whatever idealistic goals of trust and community may have accompanied the creation of computers and, in particular, "social" media, they have been overwhelmed by lust for money and power or, at best, pressure for income and "monetization."
My reaction to it is somewhat equivocal. At the least, I think the author overstates his case (it was in the opinion section, so being opinionated is allowed). I'm post the link because I think many of you will find it interesting, even if you don't manage to get all the way through it.
i did not read the whole article.
but:
did anybody ever imply that silicon valley (or social media) was our friend?
the author seems to be talking about google, and how it was all for the good of the internet community in the beginning...
how naive is all that?
i'll give him/her that much:
most IT businesses like to draw the altruistic card regularly and with much flourish.
but i never thought anybody believed it.
(and now that i enabled javascript to see the silly animation, even more naive!!!)
Over the last fifteen years or so, "Silcon Valley" implemented "George Orwell's 1984 at its very worst," then kept right on going. Today, your cell phone (and the telephone switch ...) eavesdrops on your every word, and the camera in your computer might surreptitiously film, both inside "the sanctity of your own home" and without your knowledge. E-mails and other communications have none of the privacy that you know to expect (by law ...) from their physical counterparts. Computers know what you look like and what you sound like, and (within 7 feet) exactly where you are ... where your children are ... and whether right-now they are "home alone."
All of this "happy little cloud horse-sh*t" will change. It's only a question of exactly what will change it. Will we be smart enough to do it ourselves, before it's too late?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.