GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The Associated Press, after conceding that reports that Google is generally up front about its privacy settings, reports that Google may be tracking you even when you tell it not to.
Here's an excerpt. The story itself is rather long and detailed and I recommend reading the whole thing:
Quote:
Storing your minute-by-minute travels carries privacy risks and has been used by police to determine the location of suspects — such as a warrant that police in Raleigh, North Carolina, served on Google last year to find devices near a murder scene. So the company will let you "pause" a setting called Location History.
Google says that will prevent the company from remembering where you've been. Google's support page on the subject states: "You can turn off Location History at any time. With Location History off, the places you go are no longer stored."
That isn't true. Even with Location History paused, some Google apps automatically store time-stamped location data without asking.
Is anybody surprised ?. I went through the "turn everything off" rigmarole and I still have to go back and do it as they add more "features". I have no history, I have location off, and I ignore all the nagging I get.
Of course, what cell tower you are using and the fact almost everyone (not me) broadcasts for wifi and bluetooth connections continuously pinpoints us all pretty well anyway.
In some countries you are required to use a government issued SIM that does an even better job - even tourists have to use them.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
When I load up Google, I assume this is what people are talking about: "Choose the privacy settings that are right for you" - "Take your Privacy Checkup" ?
I didn't, but I really don't care if Google knows my location, etc. I would load it up through tor and/or use Tails if I was worried...
The government already has my information, and I don't give a rats arse what they think of me, they are a bunch of morons anyways... they are also completely useless too, but that's another story...
I'm wondering why it even lets you turn it off in the first place. I really don't think it's unreasonable for a device to stop tracking you if it prompts to do so. I think that ordinary people would agree, which makes me think Google is definitely wrong here. It's not even that I have to go find an RMS essay to support this, either.
(Yea, yeah, that way it can see who it should *really* be watching! Spare me.)
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myk267
I'm wondering why it even lets you turn it off in the first place...
Maybe the better question is; do they really want you to be able to "turn it off" ? It seems to me that it's not in Google's interest to stop tracking people. Why would it be?
Also, I'd be more worried about ISP level tracking. Wouldn't that be far more effective for the government? I'm sure the NSA for one (but not limited to) has done/is already doing that...
This article from Sunday's New York Time magazine seems relevant to this thread. It details efforts on the part of three individuals to attempt to legislate curbs on Silicon Valley's spynet:
it's a long and interesting article; i didn't finish it, but i wish that mctaggart all the best.
currently my "company" has to concern itself with (electronic) data protection, and it seems that task will be largely mine because i'm the only "expert", so i do a lot of reading and first-hand-experiencing atm.
there seems to be a lot of misinformation going around; i have a feeling it is seeded in america, and maybe even by those 2 big companies...
one thing i do know: google does its worst to
appear "safe" - hence no need for data protection
obfuscate the differences between the internet and the googleverse
i'm on a timetable right now, but i'd like to finish that article and continue discussing these things with y'all.
I sometimes adjust my privacy settings in my google account, BUT it's hard to tell if my privacy settings are working or they are transparently being ignore.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.